|  | ContentsResolution on Women and Science by the European Parliament Personalities: Jenny Whittal Ethnic Minorities in Construction in Britain: Exclusion or Inclusionby Clara H. Greed
 
 Resolution on Women and Science03/02/2000 - EP VOTE 1st READINGThe European Parliament approved a resolution on women and
    science drafted by Mrs. E. McNALLY (PES, UK). The Resolution welcomes the Commission's proposal to
    increase the involvement of women in programmes organised by the EU and
    supports the strategy of research by, for and on women as being
    comprehensive and constructive. It approves the aim of collating a more
    comprehensive set of statistics on the involvement of women in different
    fields of science and research and supports the Commission's efforts to
    produce comparable data. It calls for gender-impact studies on the
    implementation of the Fifth Framework Programme to be taken into account
    when the Sixth Framework Programme is being drawn up so as to ensure that
    research topics of special interest to women are given due priority. It also
    calls for the appointment of a large percentage of women to serve on
    committees that set policies, select and evaluate projects and control funds
    at both EU and Member State levels. It calls on the Member States: 
      
        to improve the balance between men and women when they
        nominate such national experts and committee members;
        when granting aid, to ensure that the award criteria are
        clear and that grants are made in condi-tions of the greatest possible
        transparency;
        to take measures which support the dissociation of
        attitudes to course selection from traditional gender specific role
        models. Among other things, it calls on the Commission: 
      
        to investigate the reasons for the discrepancy between
        the number of women graduating in sci-entific disciplines and the number
        who are successful in obtaining professional posts;
        to promote the need for greater levels of numeracy,
        statistical and IT training;
        to avoid where possible and to combat when necessary,
        the unjustified positive discrimination in favour of boys in educational
        and scientific policy with regard to both the world of work and higher
        education;
        to facilitate mentoring systems within networks of women
        scientists;
        to observe 'International Women's University of
        Technology and Culture' to be held as part of the Hanover Expo 2000. Lastly, it invites the Commission to consider setting up a
    properly resources group with responsibility for monitoring the
    effectiveness of mainstreaming in the work of each DG and for addressing the
    under-representation of women. 25/11/1999 - DECISION OF COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLEThe committee adopted the report by Eryl McNALLY (PES, UK)
    on the Commission communication "Women and science - Mobilising women
    to enrich European research" (consultation procedure). The report
    welcomed the Commission proposal, the aims and objectives of which it
    supported. It endorsed in particular the broad definition of
    "science" adopted by the Commission, the idea of compiling
    statistics on the involvement of women in different fields of science and
    research through closer cooperation between the Member States and the
    proposal to ensure greater representation of women at both EU and Member
    State levels on committees that set policies, select and evaluate projects
    and control funds (in particular it backed the Commission's aim of ensuring
    that at least 40% of those participating in European Research Forums,
    advisory groups, assessment and monitoring panels are women). The report
    also called for the establishment at European level of a data-base of female
    experts to publicise the scientific expertise of women. It asked the
    Commission and Member States to cooperate in the compilation of better
    statistics to help ensure a large attendance at the conferences planned for
    May 2000 (with national civil servants) and May 2001 (with women
    scientists). The report was critical of the obstacles in the education and
    training system that girls aged 16 and over and women have to surmount
    before entering the world of science and technology. To deal with this the
    Commission should take steps to combat the existing positive discrimination
    in favour of boys in educational and scientific policy with regard to both
    the world of work and higher education. Lastly, the report called on
    networks of women scientists to become better involved in the
    decision-making and policy-making process, at both EU and Member State
    level. 17/02/1999 - INITIAL PROPOSALPURPOSE: to mobilise women to enrich European research and
    to describe what action has and will be taken by the Commission in the field
    of research and technological development in order to achieve this
    objective. CONTENT: the European Union at the service of its citizens
    must, in line with its general principles, set itself objectives regarding
    equal opportunities for men and women in the field of scientific re-search.
    Women are currently under-represented in this field: the aim is therefore to
    encourage women to take part in European research. Efforts will have to be
    made at European and Member State level in order to rectify this situation.
    As part of its information policy, the Commission will also seek to ensure
    that women are informed about the schemes and programmes intended to
    increase their participation in scientific research. The Commission
    undertakes to make significant efforts to increase women's participation in
    Community research programmes; the overall objective is to achieve for women
    at least 40% representation, on average throughout the 5thFramework
    Programme, in Marie Curie scholarships, advisory groups and assessment
    panels. Accordingly, the Commission undertakes to pursue two
    objectives: 
      
        to stimulate discussion and the sharing of experience in
        this field among the Member States so that action can be taken as
        effectively as possible at all levels of power;
        to develop a coherent approach towards promoting women
        in research financed by the Union, with the aim of significantly
        increasing the number of women involved in research during the period of
        the Fifth Framework Programme. The purpose of this communication is to describe what action
    has been and will be taken by the Commission in the field of research and
    technological development to achieve these two objectives, presenting it
    against the more general background of the European Union's policy on equal
    opportunities, on the one hand, and the action taken in the Member States,
    on the other. It should be noted that a very wide range of measures has been
    introduced at Member State level. Accordingly, action has been taken by the
    Commission. For instance: 
      
        discussion and sharing experience: a group of experts ,
        a group of national civil servants and a network of women scientists;
        a coherent approach within the Fifth Framework Programme;
        a coordinating structure for implementing the gender and
        science watch system within the 5th Framework Programme. By setting up the various schemes described in this
    communication, the Commission is providing increased opportunities for women
    to take part in scientific research. However, these efforts will have been
    in vain unless all those concerned express their interest by working
    together towards this goal. The Commission will assess the measures which
    have been taken in accordance with this communication and will report on
    them to the European Parliament and the Council.  
 
        
          |   | Jenny Whittal completed her BSc in Surveying at
            UCT in 1989 and proceeded directly with her Masters degree in
            Engineering at the same university. Her thesis investigated the use
            of GPS for vertical crustal deformation monitoring for the Lesotho
            Highlands Water Project. After graduating with her MSc (Eng) in 1991
            Jenny began working for the Cape Town City Council with whom she had
            a 4-year bursary commitment. She completed her cadastral articles
            and was registered as a Professional Land Surveyor in February 1993.
            Jenny also became registered to perform Sectional Title work in
            March 1994 and became a Senior Land Surveyor. In July 1996 she left
            the City Council of Cape Town to join the Department of Geomatics at
            the University of Cape Town as a Senior Lecturer. Jenny had lectured
            at the Universities of Natal and UCT and also the Cape Technikon
            prior to joining UCT. She currently teaches introductory and
            advanced surveying as well as error theory and parametric least
            squares. Jenny has also lectured map projections at undergraduate
            and post-graduate level and is involved in running the annual camps
            for Geomaticians and Civil Engineers during the April and November
            vacations.
            
           |  In November 1993 Jenny Whittal was co-opted onto the
    Council of the Institute of Professional Land Surveyors of the Western Cape
    and in April 1995 was elected vice-president. She held this office till
    March 1997 when she was elected President of the Institute, a position she
    held until March of 1999 as the first woman President of any of the
    Institutes of Land Surveyors in South Africa. Currently Jenny is the chair
    of a number of committees of the Institute Council and the immediate Past
    President. In addition to the Institute involvement, Jenny serves as the
    alternate representative from the University to the Education Advisory
    Committee (EAC) of the Professional Land Surveyors and Technical Surveyors
    Organisation, she is the Chair of the Screening Sub-committee of the EAC
    which assesses applications for membership. Jenny is also a member of the
    Standards Generating Body drawing up unit standards for the profession. Jenny
    Whittal has been involved in the organisation of many local meetings and
    international conferences, including the 1995 FIG/SURVEY 95 conference,
    meetings of the Southern African GPS User Group, and the International
    Conference on Land Tenure (January 1998).
             Jenny's research interests are varied, although
            she hopes to specialize in investigating the registration of rights
            in land and specifically the non-usage of systems to record formal
            rights of expectation to freehold property and the disputes arising
            therefrom in Cape Town. Recent work has also been done in analysing
            the cost-effectiveness of combined GLONASS/GPS receivers and also in
            regional improvement of the EGM96 geoid using GPS and levelling
            data. Computer Aided Learning is also a major area of interest as
            Jenny believes that interactive inter/intranet material to teach,
            monitor, and test students is a powerful aid and offers many
            benefits to the learner and also assist in the provision of
            introductory courses in geomatics within the southern African
            region. Initial research has been performed on recruitment and
            retention in Geomatics and particularly on the success of the
            marketing strategy employed by the Department since 1999. Marketing
            of non-profit, service pro-viding, organisations is challenging and
            interesting. Jenny Whittal's personal interests
    include surfskiing, mountain climbing, mountain biking, surfing, swimming,
    hobiecat sailing, and bird watching. Jenny is married to Hamish Whittal, a
    contractor in the LINUX and network administration fields. They have a
    daughter, Cara Rebekah born on 13th September 1999, who is providing great
    joy and blessing in their lives.
   
 Ethnic Minorities in Construction in Britain:
    Exclusion or Inclusionby Clara H. Greed Introduction: What is the ProblemThis paper discusses the changing composition and culture
    of the construction industry with reference to the increased representation
    of ethnic minorities within the construction and built environment
    professions in Britain. Drawing on recent research (Greed,1997a,
    Ismail,1998), it addresses the issues generated both for the industry, and
    for the minority individuals therein. Following an explanation of the
    conceptual and methodological dimensions of the study, the situation in
    education and practice is discussed. Those factors which facilitate or
    discourage increased entrance and subsequent progress are highlighted. In
    the final part of the paper, change agents are identified which might
    transform the situation for the future. In the conclusion the benefits to
    the industry of drawing its workforce from a more diverse and representative
    range of groups within society - and the changes in management practices
    required to harness this potential - are discussed. Ethnic minorities comprise around 5% of the population of
    Britain (CSO,1996), and, (depending on which criteria are used, and taking
    into account the fact there are no comprehensive figures) they constitute
    around 3% of those employed in the construction industry (CITB,1996). It may
    appear therefore, that pro rata, ethnic minorities, are doing quite
    well, compared with women, who compose 52% of the population, but constitute
    less than 5% of the construction workforce. But, as will be illustrated,
    ethnic minority individuals compose far less than 1% of membership of the
    professional bodies in construction. Whilst some construction organisations
    have welcomed and supported ethnic minority professionals, from the research
    it is clear there are problems to be addressed, not least the images and
    attitudes held by some within the industry as to the perceived place and
    role of minority individuals within the industry. The study particularly investigated the situation in
    civil engineering, construction management and building surveying, which
    represent three key aspects of the construction professions, namely design,
    management and technology. However, comparisons were made with housing,
    architecture and planning. This is because these specialisms have a higher
    representation of minority groups than the areas under consideration, and so
    it was important to identify why they were seen as more attractive.
    Comparisons are also made in the paper, and within the accompanying tables,
    in respect of the changing gender, class and age composition of the
    industry. For example, Table 1, shows the ethnic composition of first year
    undergraduate students across the range of construction professional
    specialisms for comparative purposes. Table 2 also shows gender composition,
    because around a quarter of all ethnic minority students on built
    environment courses are female. Likewise age composition is shown and its
    significance, in respect of minority students, is considered later in the
    paper. Thus it is considered unrealistic to deal with 'ethnicity' in
    isolation within such a diverse society as Britain, in which many factors
    are at work determining a person's career (cf Phillips and Phillips,1998).
    For example, black women architects strongly believe they should not
    rendered invisible in academic work in which, they consider, it is often
    assumed that, 'all the women are white, and all the blacks are men' (Hull et
    al, 1982; quoted in de Graft-Johnson,1999). Table 1: Ethnicity  
     
      
        | An RICS sample membership survey found in 1995 (these are numbers
          not percentages) the following numbers for the professional body: | In comparison for the Chartered Institute of
          Housing for 1996 the figures are as follows as percentage of total
          membership: |  
        | Bangladeshi | 10 | 0 % (17 individuals) |  
        | Black African | 214 | 1 % (168) |  
        | Black Caribbean | 79 | 1 % (176) |  
        | Black other | 21 | 1 % (102) |  
        | Chinese | 2320 | 7 % (957) |  
        | Indian | 139 | 1 % (128) |  
        | Pakistani | 234 | 0 % (57) |  
        | Other | 26 | 1 % (153) |  
        | Rest [White] |  | 72 % |  Only the RICS and RTPI gave me figures on disability
    which was also clearly seen as another very 'other' category. Injury from
    accidents in the construction industry usually often results in workers
    leaving the industry, because of disability. It is not part of the culture
    of construction to see disability as a reason for taking people on. As will be seen in the education section of this appendix
    in some specialisms ethnic minority students outnumber all women 2 to 1. On
    a 'typical' large building site one is more likely to encounter a male Asian
    construction professional than a woman of any category. Few ethnic minority
    candidates in construction are women, except in housing, where there are
    large numbers of women generally. But in Housing (CIOH) women outnumber men
    2:1 among ethnic minorities, but this is in part accounted for by larger
    contingents of overseas and Chinese categories women. Indeed I found many
    professional bodies went in for a touch of sleight of hand of including the
    overseas categories to increase the ethnic minority component at student
    level, but excluding them 'normally' from the mainstream full membership,
    'you don’t want overseas members do you?'. In the harder construction end
    of the industry as a whole male ethnic minority individuals appear to
    outnumber their women ethnic minorities by at least 3:1, which still makes
    it a higher proportion of women than found among the white home population.
    Male ethnic minority professionals out in practice often appear to outnumber
    women of any category, as I have frequently observed at professional
    meetings and workplace situations - although from the statistics one would
    expect more women to be visible. Even where women or ethnic minorities are
    prominent they are unlikely to be in senior posts. The RTPI had 571 ethnic minority members (including 180
    students) and 71 disabled members in 1994 many of the later also being
    retired (elderly) members. The figures for 1997 were a little over 764
    (including 164 students) and 100 respectively. As to disabled planning
    students the figure still rests at 2 under-graduate and 2 post-graduate
    students as it was in my last survey on this in 1994. As can be seen the
    RTPI gave a figure for disability, and the only other body to do so was the
    RICS gave me two different figures on disability, the latest for 1995 being
    1246 disabled members, interestingly both bodies put these figures in with
    the ethnicity figures for me. RIBA statistics showed for 1996, that of all
    new entrants to architecture courses, 5% were Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi;
    and 2% Afro-Caribbean, making up a total of 7% of all new entrants to
    architecture last year. (RIBA,1997, Education Statistics for 1996/7) but
    RIBA were vaguer about those in practice. Not all architectural schools send
    back their replies to RIBA as requested on the ethnic origin of their
    students, so the figures are by no means accurate, but they give some
    indication of the situation. Several of the engineering and other building and
    construction professional bodies were at a complete loss to offer ethnicity
    figures but some offered age of regional location instead. Where information
    is available it is often unclear 'who' is included in the generic totals,
    such as whether 'overseas members' are included, and if Black British
    professionals are counted as part of the 'home' UK membership along with
    white professionals. If ethnic origin questions are asked, they may be very
    general. For example, one finds the codings used vary and often manifest
    alarming transglobal combinations covering millions of diverse populations,
    such as the popular disaggregated 'Asian' category which includes everyone
    from the Middle to Far East, or just 'black'. Another curious 'cultural'
    factor is the complete dismissal, 'pretend they don't exist'
    mentality towards American construction companies shown by some construction
    professionals. As indicated earlier some professional bodies appear confused
    as to whether to include overseas national members under 'overseas' or
    'ethnic minority' categories. The invisibility of 'nationals' who, globally,
    form a large component of the ex-pat dominated 'colonial' construction
    industry makes the globe appear 'whiter' and more 'English' than it really
    is. Yet, it is still more popular to discuss the problems of 'multi-ethnic'
    workers in situations where a range of professionals are working together
    from different countries on an international building site, than it is to
    discuss the problems of 'ethnic minorities' on British building sites. Table 2. RPTI Membership 1994 for
  Comparison 
      
        | GRADE | TOTAL | FEMALE | NON-WHITE | DISABLED |  
        | Fellow | 613 | 20 | 15 | 5 |  
        | Member | 1268 | 2553 | 364 | 35 |  
        | Student | 3094 | 1309 | 180 | 4 |  
        | Legal | 144 | 8 | - | - |  
        | Honorary | 63 | 6 | - | - |  
        | International | 26 | 8 | 4 | - |  
        | Retired | 807 | 28 | 8 | 28 |  
        | All | 17435 | 3932 | 571 | 72 |  Source and Categories from RTPI, as presented in Greed,
    1994. The non-white is not divided into male and female by the RTPI. Also
    note how many of the 'disabled' appear to be elderly retired members. Table 3: Accepted Candidates in UCAS
  Subject Group: Architecture, Building and Planning 
      
        | Age at 30.9.96 | Under 21 | 21 to end of 24 | 25 and over | Total |  
        | Sex | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female |  
        | Ethnicity |  
        | Unknown | 179 | 30 | 81 | 14 | 95 | 23 | 355 | 67 |  
        | White | 2967 | 764 | 435 | 56 | 354 | 88 | 3756 | 908 |  
        | Black | 44 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 55 | 25 | 119 | 48 |  
        | Asian | 209 | 55 | 33 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 259 | 62 |  
        | Other | 20 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 36 | 17 |  
        | Total | 3419 | 877 | 573 | 81 | 533 | 144 | 4525 | 1102 |  
        | Class |  
        | Unknown | 254 | 57 | 105 | 24 | 145 | 44 | 504 | 125 |  
        | Professional | 530 | 170 | 56 | 6 | 33 | 15 | 619 | 191 |  
        | Intermediate | 1373 | 338 | 150 | 23 | 120 | 42 | 1643 | 403 |  
        | Skilled non manual | 355 | 102 | 50 | 12 | 49 | 27 | 454 | 141 |  
        | Skilled manual | 624 | 140 | 152 | 9 | 141 | 10 | 917 | 159 |  
        | Partly Skilled | 225 | 61 | 46 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 302 | 73 |  
        | Unskilled | 58 | 9 | 14 | - | 14 | 1 | 86 | 10 |  
        | Total (same) | 3419 | 877 | 573 | 81 | 533 | 144 | 4525 | 1102 |  Adapted from HESA figures, note class is based on
    father's occupation By Clara H. GreedFaculty of the Built Environment, UWE, Bristol
 E-mail: Clara.Greed@uwe.ac.uk
 with
    Adjmal Ismail (researcher on ethnic minorities in construction management). 
 
        
          | Editor: Chair of the Task Force on Under-represented Groups in 
      Surveying Ms. Gabriele Dasse, Kleinfeld 22a, D-21149 Hamburg, 
      Germany
 Email gabriele.dasse@gv.hamburg.de
 Fax 
      + 49 40 428 265 265
 Tel. + 49 40 428 265 250
 web site: http://www.fig.net/figtree/tf/underrep/tfunrep.htm
 4/00, month of issue: December © Copyright 2000 Gabriele Dasse. Permission is 
      granted to photocopy in limited quantity for educational 
      purposes.
 Other requests 
      to photocopy or otherwise reproduce material in this newsletter should be 
      addressed to the Editor.
 |  |