| Nominations for FIG Commission Chairs for the term of 
	  office 2006-2010 and Chairs Elect 2004-2006To the Member Associations of FIG,  The FIG Council has decided at its meeting in Marrakech, November 30, 
	2003 to extend the time for nominating chairs-elect of the commissions of 
	FIG for 2004-2006 until 20 January 2004. These chairs-elect will then 
	automatically be appointed as commission chairs for 2006-2010.  The reason for this extension is that by 23 November 2003 there were no 
	nominations for Commissions 1, 4 and 6. The Council decided to extend the 
	time for nominations for all commissions to allow the member associations to 
	consider the situation and list of nominations as whole.  To help with your considerations the Council further decided to publish 
	the list of nominations received. The nomination list as of today is:  
					Commission 1: NilCommission 2: Bela Markus (Hungary)Commission 3: Chryssy Potsiou (Greece) and Robert Mahoney
      			  (RICS, UK)Commission 4: NilCommission 5: Mikael Lilje (Sweden)Commission 6: NilCommission 7: András Osskó (Hungary) and Winfried Hawerk 
      (Germany)Commission 8: Diane Dumashie (RICS, UK) proposed chair and 
					Spike Boydell (RICS, UK/Fiji) proposed chair elect and 
					August 
	  Røsnes (Norway)Commission 9: Simon Adcock (Australia) and Kauko Viitanen 
      (MIL, Finland)Commission 10: Andrew Morley (ICES, UK)  The proposal of the election to the General Assembly will be prepared by 
	the Commission Review Group. In making its recommendations to the General 
	Assembly the CRG will take into consideration the following criteria and 
	guidelines:  Criteria:  Candidates should  
					Be suitably qualified (IR 11.4 calls for demonstrated possession of 
	  the personal and professional capabilities needed to lead the work of the 
	  commissionHave the support (financial and professional) of the member 
	  association (IR 11.4)Be active in the commission (IR 11.4)Have the support of the commission. The current commission chair is to 
	  be consulted in every nomination and will seek further comments from the 
	  commission membersRepresent a geographical, cultural and linguistic spread in order to 
	  present a balanced portfolio of candidates as required by IR 11.9. (Where 
	  candidates have equal qualifications then preference will be given to 
	  those nominations promoting geographical, cultural and linguistic 
	  distribution across the Commissions.)Be a member of and have the formal support of their member association 
	  according to IR 11.12Be well known and recognized in the profession.  Additional guidelines:  
					All nominees – both those approved and not approved by the CRG - are 
	  to be announced publicly and listed to the General Assembly.If possible there should be more than one candidate per commission, 
	  per IR 11.9.The final appointment of chairs-elect lies with the General Assembly 
	  per IRs 11.4 and 11.8IRs 9.5 and 9.6, relating to the NRG are to be applied to the CRG 
	  process for election of chairs-elect.  Voting by the General Assembly will follow the procedure of paragraph 9.6 
	of the Internal Rules.  The member associations are reminded that a formal nomination letter is 
	also needed for the current vice chairpersons of commissions so that they 
	will be considered as candidates. In the nomination letter a curriculum 
	vitae of the candidate shall be included and a statement from the member 
	association that it will support the candidate in his work.  At the General Assembly each candidate will be asked to make a short 
	speech in which he/she explains his/her goals and special competences for 
	chairing the commission. |