| 
  
     | 
	  FIG Standards Network
  |  The Role and Work of the FIG Standards Task Force1. Background1.1 The development of standards is a long process and currently involves few 
surveyors. This often results in impractical or outdated standards. FIG believes 
that it can assist in the creation of workable standards covering survey 
activities by being involved in the work of standardisation bodies (including 
but not limited to ISO); as an international NGO, FIG is one of the few bodies 
through which surveyors can formally be represented in international 
standardisation activity. FIG can also assist in publicising and explaining the 
implications of standards for surveyors. Until more permanent arrangements are 
put in place, the Standards Task Force will co-ordinate this activity on behalf 
of FIG. 2. External Relationships2.1 The Task Force will need to create working relationships with 
standardisation bodies, starting with ISO. In this regard, the Task Force can 
play an important part in the promotion and marketing of FIG to a wider 
community. There are two primary roles: 
  Assisting in the production of workable and timely standards by proposing 
  material which can be transformed into international standards (rather than 
  relying on work developed by others) and by participating in the process of 
  developing standards; andDisseminating information and creating explanatory material ands guidance 
  notes to ensure that all members of FIG are aware of the most recent 
  standardisation activities, standards and regulations, and their implications 
  for surveyors. 2.2 A questionnaire distributed in early 1999 indicated that the appropriate 
relationships with standards bodies are at the global level for FIG, and at the 
national level for Member Associations. 2.3 Another key group of relationships is with other NGOs representing 
surveyors (for instance, IAG, CLGE, ICEC and ISPRS); the particular relationship 
on standards will need to be built. 3. Internal Relationships3.1 The Task Force will be directed by the Council and the General Assembly. 3.2 The key relationships for the Task Force during its work will be with the 
Commissions, Permanent Institutions and Member Associations. In essence, the 
Task Force will provide the external face of FIG to the standardisation bodies, 
translating the requirements of each to the other and providing appropriate 
contacts as necessary. The Task Force will also be responsible for prioritising 
the proposed standards work of FIG and ensuring that the appropriate commissions 
take these priorities and turn them into action. The Commissions will work 
within their fields of specialisation, always conscious of the possible use and 
implications of standards in that work, and consulting with the Task Force as to 
how best this can be accomplished. 4. Work4.1 The work plan for the Task Force has been shaped by the responses to the 
1999 questionnaire to Member Associations. This showed a particular requirement 
to collect and disseminate information about the activity of ISO, and a need for 
FIG to take part as an active member of standardisation bodies to gain more 
influence in decision making. 4.2 The work of the Task Force will include: 
  The creation of a working relationship with the ISO Central Secretariat to 
  acquaint them with the benefits that a relationship with FIG can bring them, 
  and agree the most appropriate ways in which to realise the benefits;Reviewing the current standardisation activity which impact on surveyors 
  and determining (with the Commissions) how these can best be interpreted for 
  surveyors - the ISO work highlighted in the questionnaire results is that of 
  TC59, TC172, TC204 and TC211;A review, with the Commissions, Permanent Institutions and Member 
  Associations, of items of their work (past, present and future) which relate 
  to or impact on standards;Discussing and agreeing with other international organisations 
  representing surveyors how we can work most effectively together in the field 
  of standards;Discussing with instrument manufacturers and others how they have become 
  involved in standardisation activities, to see what lessons we can learn from 
  their experiences;Creating a guide for the Council and Commissions as to how they can best 
  integrate FIG material with standards, and for member associations as to how 
  they can best influence national and international standardisation activity;Creating and maintaining, with the Commissions, an appropriate list of FIG 
  experts to relevant standardisation activities;In light of progress with ISO, determining the most appropriate 
  standardisation bodies to build further relationships (for instance, the 
  International Valuation Standards Committee - IVSC) and how this may be best 
  accomplished; andMaintaining a flow of information on the activity of the Task Force to 
  members of FIG, for instance through articles in the FIG Bulletin and on the 
  FIGTree. 4.3 During 2000, the Task Force has worked in a number of areas, including: 
  Maintaining an area of the FIG web site;Playing an active part in the work of ISO TC211 (Geographic Information/ 
  Geomatics), not least in the proposed work item on the qualification and 
  certification of personnel;Making the necessary formal links with other ISO technical committees;Continuing to build a relationship with the ISO Central Secretariat;Building a relationship with IVSC; andDrafting the FIG Guide on Standardisation. 4.4 A future work plan is attached at Annex A. 5. Membership of the Task Force5.1 The core membership of the Task Force is: 
  Iain Greenway (Chair) (IG) - will also maintain contact with MLDJean-Marie Becker (Commission 5) (JMB)Yola Georgiadou (YG)Winfried Hawerk (Commission 7) (WH) - will also maintain contact with 
  OICRFLarry Hothem (LH)Martin Scheu (Commission 3) (MS)Vaclav Slaboch (Commission 5) (VS)Brian Waldy (Commission 9) (BW) 5.2 Those who will be kept fully informed of activity are: 
  John Collinge (Ad hoc Commission on Construction Economics)Stig Enemark (Commission 2, and Chair of the FIG Task Force on Mutual 
  Recognition)Mary Feindt (Commission 8)Rob Hare (Commission 4) (RH)Matt HigginsTom Kennie (Bureau) (TK)Hans KnoopMikael LiljeCraig MacauleyOtto Heunecke (Commission 6)John Parker (Commission 1)Jes Ryttersgaard (Commission 3)Sverre SteenEmmanuel Tembo 6. Time ScaleThe Task Force will continue to work until the 2002 General Assembly, with 
reports to the intermediate General Assemblies. Future arrangements for 
standards issues in FIG will be proposed by the Task Force on Commission 
Structure. 
 Iain Greenway 27 December 2000 
   WORK PLAN – UPDATED DECEMBER 2000
  
    |  | Task | Timescale | Lead |  
  | 1 | Create guide on standardisation activity for Bureau, Commissions and 
	Member Associations (to include a policy statement) | For review at the 2001 General Assembly, May 2001 and ratification at the 
	2002 GA | (a) |  
  | 2 | Determine how the FIG documents can be integrated with standards | ISO decided not to take forward the Statement on the Cadastre; in Seoul, 
	the Task Force will have to decide if there is another FIG document which 
	can be taken forward with ISO | IG/ WH |  
  | 3 | Continue to build relations with IVSC | Framework for co-operation formalised by 30 April 2001 | BW |  
  | 4 | Maintain two-way links with Commissions on current work | Ongoing | Commission reps (Terms of Reference to be included in Guide) |  
  | 5 | Review previous Commission/ PI work which could possibly be integrated 
	with standards | April 2001 | Task Force, esp. Commission reps |  
  | 6 | Ensure that standards issues and priorities are addressed in the 2002-06 
	Commission work plans | Ongoing, working through ACCO | IG/ TK/ Commission reps |  
  | 7 | Build relations on standards with other organisations representing 
	surveyors | Ongoing; to be progressed formally via Memoranda of Understanding | (b) |  
  | 8 | Maintain Task Force section on FIG Web site | 6-monthly | IG/ FIG Office |  
  | 9 | Manage experts to and information flow from ISO TC211 (c) | Ongoing | IG |  
  | 10 | Manage experts to and information flow from ISO TC172 [and TC59] (c) | Ongoing | JMB |  
  | 11 | Monitor developments with ISO TC204 | Ongoing | IG via ISO Secretariat |  
  | 12 | Consider paper(s) for Washington | 31 March 01 | IG/ TF |  
  | 13 | Present paper on TF progress in Seoul | May 01 | IG |  
  | 14 | Manage Task Force activity | Ongoing; 6 monthly progress reviews (d) | IG and Task Force |  Notes on Work Plan: (a) It was agreed in Prague that the Guide would include a policy statement 
(what is FIG trying to achieve in the standards area, and what are its 
priorities?). An outline timetable is as follows: 
  
    | Task | Lead | By |  
    | (i) Draft policy statement | IG | Done |  
    | (ii) Task Force review of Guide, including policy statement | TF members | Done |  
    | (iii) Revise | IG | Done |  
    | (iv) ACCO and Bureau review | IG to despatch | Done |  
    | (v) Revise | IG | Done |  
    | (vi) Submit for formal Bureau consideration | IG | Done |  
    | (vii) GA review of policy and document | FIG Office | May 01 |  
    | (viii) Final revisions, in particular the responsibilities after the Task 
	  Force is wound up | IG/ TF member/ TK/ Council | Oct 01 |  
    | (ix) Ratification by GA | FIG Office | Apr 02 |  
    | (x) Publish | FIG Office | 30 June 02 |  (b) Leads by organisation are as follows: 
  ICA - IG  ISPRS - YGIAG - LH  IHO - RHOGC - WH UN/ECE WPLA (MOLA) - Paul van der Molen via WHEuroGeographics (and CEN TC287) - VS Instrument Manufacturers - JMB and VS IVSC - BW (c) The role and responsibilities of experts will be defined in the Guide, 
but will include regular reporting back to FIG Member Associations in an 
appropriate format (for instance, the FIG Bulletin). (d) The progress reviews will be provided to the Director of the FIG Office, 
all Task Force members and all Commission chairs. Appropriate summaries will be 
provided on the FIG Web site and through the FIG Bulletin. Appropriate 
information will also be provided to the ISO Central Secretariat, appropriate 
ISO TC chairs, and those who completed the questionnaire and indicated that they 
wish to be informed of progress. The next review will be in May 01. CORE TASK FORCE MEMBERS - CONTACT DETAILS
  
    | Mr Iain Greenway13 Hazelbury Park
 Clonee
 Dublin 15
 IRELAND
 Phone + 353 1 802 5316
 Fax + 353 1 820 4156
 email 
	  iain.greenway@btinternet.com
 | Dr. Vaclav SlabochResearch Institute of Geodesy VUGTK
 CZ-250 66 Zdiby 98
 Czech Republic
 Phone + 420 2 685 7907
 Fax + 420 2 685 7056
 email vaclav.slaboch@vugtk.cz
 |  
    | Dr.-Ing. Martin ScheuHead of the Grit Branch Office
 Maxstr. 3a
 D-13347 Berlin
 GERMANY
 Phone + 49 30 4660 6280
 Fax + 49 30 4660 6282
 email scheu@grit.de
 | Prof. Jean-Marie BeckerNational Land Survey of Sweden
 S-80182 Gävle
 SWEDEN
 Phone + 46 26 153 728
 Fax + 46 26 610 676
 email  jean-marie.becker@lm.se
 |  
    | Larry HothemUSGS National Mapping Division
 521 National Center
 Room 2D-312
 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
 Reston
 VA 20192
 USA
 Phone + 1 703 648 4663
 Fax + 1 703 648 4165
 email Lhothem@erols.com
 | Brian Waldy8 Queen’s Court
 Earls Court Square
 LONDON SW5 9DA
 UK
 Phone + 44 20 7373 3543
 Fax + 44 20 7477 8573
 email  E.B.D.Waldy@city.ac.uk
 |  
    | Dr-Ing Winfried HawerkAmt fur Geoinformation und Vermessung
 Sachsenkamp 4
 Postfach 10 05 04
 D-20003 HAMBURG
 GERMANY
 Phone + 49 40 428 26 54 40
 Fax + 49 40 428 26 59 63
 email  
	  winfried.hawerk@gv.hamburg.de
 | Dr-Ing Yola GeorgiadouDivision Geoinformatics & Spatial Data Acquisition
 ITC
 Hengelosestraat 99
 PO Box 6
 7500 AA ENSCHEDE
 NETHERLANDS
 Phone + 31 53 487 43 92
 Fax + 31 53 487 43 35
 email  georgiadou@itc.nl
 |  |