| 
 Summary of Models of Surveying Curricula around the
          World
by Julian "Jud" Rouch 
 Key words: curricula, assessment, competencies, trends.   
 Abstract1. Introduction Commission Two, Working Group Three is University
          Curricula – Content, Trends, Assessment and Competencies. In the
          process of collecting information for the report that we plan to have
          ready by the end of 2001 we have had paper presentation sessions at a
          Commission Two symposium held at the Wuhan Technical University, China
          in October, 1998 and at the 1999 FIG Working Week at Sun City. There
          will be additional papers adding to the information pool during the
          FIG 2000 Working Week in Prague and at a planned Commission Two
          symposium to be held in Rosario City, Argentina in October 2000. I
          would expect that the area would be further explored in papers
          presented at the FIG 2001 Working Week in Korea. 2. Present StatusWe are finding that surveying education curricula
          is dictated by the norms of practice in each country. Different
          discipline areas from one country to another conduct the various
          elements of the profession. We see that the education of surveying
          practitioners needs to follow that of the various disciplines involved
          in the total arena. These areas of surveying education are in a rapid
          state of change. The education models of the past and even those in
          current use do not necessarily fit the evolving future of our
          profession. So we must look at and analyze the past, present, and
          conceivable future education models, their problems and the various
          potential solutions to these problems. 3. Future Requirements Practitioners in the surveying and mapping fields
          are moving rapidly from being collectors of data to being managers of
          both data and business. They will continue to make intricate
          measurement and evaluate boundary evidence, for which they will need
          sound technical education, but they will also have to exhibit superior
          management skills. The advent of Geographical Information Systems
          technology and the development of new tools and methods such as global
          positioning require intensive study to encompass theoretical,
          practical, and management skills necessary to operate productively in
          today’s environment. We need to encompass curricula that are
          adaptable to the ever-changing requirements of the information age
          that we are now progressing into. This puts a new level of importance
          on our curriculum design and assessment. As new methods of teaching
          strategies are designed and implemented, the assessment of their
          effectiveness must be undertaken. We must continue to change our
          scheme of education as the profession that we are preparing graduates
          to enter evolves to fit the changing requirements of society. 
 Professor Julian "Jud" Rouch, PLSThe University of Arkansas at Little Rock
 2801 South University Avenue
 Little Rock
 AR 72204
 USA
 Tel. + 1 501 569 8204
 Fax + 1 501 569 8002
 E-mail: jsrouch@ualr.edu
 
 
          Summary of Models of Surveying Curricula around the
          World During the Wuhan China Conference we had presentations
    that reflected various education models in Australia, China and Northern
    Europe. Kirsi Artimo of Finland presented discussion on how
    "the use of computers and information systems has changed the contents
    of university courses and that new tasks of the surveyor also require more
    space for new contents like economic and business matters." She stated
    that "The development of computer assisted learning methods has
    concentrated very much on technologies like development of interactive
    learning environments, hypermedia books, use of course information systems
    and data bases as well as e-mail and WWW." She also related that
    "education is not only technique and methods, an important part is also
    the substance. The information technology as well as other changes in the
    societies and the entire world have caused pressure to change the substance
    of surveyors education. For example ill Europe surveyors (CLGE) aim to a
    common core of geodetic surveyors curriculum, because of needs of European
    co-operation." Stig Enemark of Denmark discussed an instructional model
    that is closely aligned to the classic engineering problem solving approach.
    "The surveying and engineering programs at Aalborg University are
    project-organized and problem-based from the day the freshmen arrive until
    their graduation. Through this program Aalborg University has grasped the
    opportunity to meet the voiced need for education to be more closely aligned
    to an engineering problem-solving approach. Project-organized means that traditional taught
    courses assisted by actual practice is replaced by project work assisted by
    courses. The concept moves the perspective from description and analyzing
    into synthesizing and assessment. Each semester has a basic structure of -
    in principle - equal distribution of lecture courses and project work. The
    project work is carried out in-groups of four to six students having a
    teacher appointed as supervisor. Problem-based means that traditional
    textbook-knowledge is replaced by the necessary knowledge to solve
    theoretical problems. The concept moves the perspective from understanding
    of common knowledge into ability to develop new knowledge. The aim of the
    project work is ‘learning by doing’ or ‘action learning’. The
    project work may be organized by using a ‘know-how’ approach for
    training professional functions, or it may be organized by using a ‘know-why’
    approach for training methodological skills of problem-analysis and
    application. Tile difference between traditional subject-oriented
    education and this project-oriented educational model may be expressed in
    short by an old Chinese proverb: ‘Tell me and I will forgetShow me and I will remember
 Involve me and I will understand
 Step back and 1 will act’ "
 John Parker of Australia presented a paper on Managing
    Change Utilizing A Quality Approach. He stated that "A total
    quality approach has now been adopted for the training of cadastral
    surveyors. This involves the educational institutions, the master surveyor,
    the trainee and the Surveyors Board, and conforms with the FIG Draft Charter
    for Quality." He related that "The master surveyor is responsible
    for the preparation of the detailed training agreement, which specifies a
    Total Quality program to ensure the trainee surveyor obtains the knowledge,
    skills and attitudes required for the practice of surveying. Following
    graduation with a degree in surveying or equivalent, the training program
    consists of on the job training over an 18 month period, including fieldwork
    from which a folio of complex cadastral surveys, a cadastral law assignment
    and an oral examination in professional practice must be taken. The
    Surveyors Board audits the training program in order to determine whether
    quality principles are being followed. In adopting a quality approach to education, the
    educational institutions and the Surveyors Board work together to develop
    appropriate course content for undergraduate surveying students. The
    Surveyors Board accredits courses which provide quality education for future
    cadastral surveyors." Zhan Changgen, Liu Yaolin, and Cao Xinhua of China
    explained a model of cadastral survey practice teaching. "Through
    cadastral survey practice teaching, students' comprehension on cadastral
    survey can be deepened theoretically, technically and methodically, their
    perceptual and rational knowledge can be merged together, and their ability
    to solve practical problems be enhanced. Cadastral survey is a job that
    requires not only technical ability but knowledge about legal, policy and
    social as well. These non-technical aspects are as it important as technical
    aspects to the students, and form part of cadastral survey practice
    teaching. The practice teaching deals with wide-ranged activities
    and covers most content of cadastral information collection. Cadastral
    survey is a governmental action, which reflects both the policies and laws
    of the government with real estate, aspects. Through the practice teaching
    students master's necessary knowledge of cadastre, and have sense of
    responsibility for their jobs. Cadastral survey requires both technical skills and
    social intercourse ability. Through the practice teaching students must deal
    with various people and apply what they have learned in class into practice
    to solve various problems so as to enhance their comprehensive quality. To well organize a cadastral survey practice teaching,
    the theories and technical methods of cadastre, as well as government
    policies, regulations and laws must be taken into consideration, and we must
    give students idea and experience of hardship and complexity of cadastral
    survey." This is accomplished through a Team Operation Mode.
    "One team consists of several squadrons and has a team leader, several
    deputy team leaders and other persons in charge of general technical
    matters. Associate professors or teachers who have both rich theoretical
    knowledge and rich practical experience usually hold these positions. They
    are in charge of general work in the practice teaching. Each squadron
    consists of four to five groups. A squadron has a leader and a deputy
    leader. They are professional teachers in charge of day-to-day work during
    the practice teaching. Four to five students constitute a group. Each group
    has a group leader from students, and one or two technicians from Land
    Administration Bureau who will assist and instruct." Robert Hodgkinson of the United Kingdom presented the
    need for Quality Assurance in Surveying Education. He defined quality
    assurance as being "usually demonstrated by documented systems
    comprising policies and procedures, linked to those formal monitoring
    processes provided by each institution. Its purpose is to provide a sense of
    order, continuity and confidence that issues impinging on the quality of the
    students' learning experience have been addressed in an orderly and formal
    manner which is reflected at all levels in the institution. It is often
    rooted in common approaches and standard ways of both undertaking and
    discharging activities, which facilitate comparison and benchmarking between
    university departments and programs." "Examples of these provided by FIG members in higher
    education include the following: Internally Imposed Initiatives 
    
    Central Assessment RegulationsStandard Accreditation procedures for new and existing programsProcedures for monitoring program changes and developmentsAcademic Codes of conductFormal systems for staff appraisal and developmentTeaching observation of lecturersFormal processes to promote quality-enhancing activity Externally Imposed Initiatives 
    
    Quality Assessment by government bodiesPrescribed entry standards for studentsDefinition of syllabus content and duration of programsAppointment of external examinersConditions of appointment, job specifications and tenure for academic
      staff, including external assessment for posts above a certain level.Government induction programs for new employees." During the 1999 FIG Working Week at Sun City I presented Surveying
    Education Curricula Design In the USA. "Commencing at the beginning of this decade
    (1990) the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM) conducted a
    major national study on the status and recommended future of surveying and
    mapping education. "A panel of educational leaders representing
    industry, government, and academic professionals in surveying and mapping
    met to discuss and study surveying and mapping education in the United
    States. Significant changes in surveying and mapping sciences brought about
    by major technological developments and a concomitant demand for new
    products and services provided the impetus for this study. These changes
    have created a growing demand from industry and government for graduates
    with new knowledge and skills. But in order for colleges and universities to
    produce quality graduates, concerns relating to the vitality and health of
    existing surveying and mapping programs must be resolved. The four objectives for this study were: 
      to review the evolution and current status of surveying and mapping
        education in the USA;to examine current and emerging requirements for graduates in
        surveying and mapping disciplines;to review innovative approaches to surveying and mapping education
        which have been introduced in the USA and elsewhere; andto develop strategies for further development and enhancement of
        surveying and mapping education in the USA. The first three objectives (a, b, and c) are
    investigative activities that led to developing strategies for further
    development and enhancement of surveying and mapping education (objective
    d)." "The Report of the American Congress on Surveying
    and Mapping National Study on Surveying and Mapping Education was
    promulgated in February 1993. This report describes an investigation into
    developing a shared vision for survey and mapping education in the USA. It
    is an attempt to describe some of the educational policy issues, which face
    surveying and mapping education in the information age. It provides a
    framework for institutions and professionals to build agendas for the
    future." "Vision is critical to the long term success of
    educational institutions that support the surveying and mapping professions.
    In these economic times, automatic program funding is a dream of the past
    and educational institutions are facing new competition. The private sector
    such as publishers, software firms, and consultant groups are offering
    extensive course work. University extension programs often compete with
    degree programs. In some cases, pubic agencies have developed surveying and
    mapping curriculum to meet agency education needs." "Each institution will form its own agenda and will
    adjust to local and regional needs and conditions. A common vision for all
    institutions means that each institution's efforts will contribute to a
    greater whole; the professions themselves. Just as all states work together
    for federal democracy, each state has its own flavor and importance within
    the common structure." "New education curricula should be carefully
    designed to provide: 
      broad general education which gives basic understanding of the world,
        its institutions, and its cultures (communications, literature,
        humanities, social sciences, basic sciences).comprehensive education in the technology of spatial information: data
        gathering technology (field surveys, photogrammetry, remote sensing) and
        data management technology (GIS).basic exposure to many areas where spatial information may have
        applications: law, real estate, environmental studies, sciences,
        economics, engineering, geography, anthropology, forestry.application course work where societal problems are identified and
        spatial information is applied toward a solution: environmental
        assessment, land development planning, land ownership and
        administration, economic planning of operations and facilities, and
        physical planning of facilities. All these subjects should be taught
        from a spatial information orientation. Professional surveying & mapping courses should be
    more "open-form" where a large range of scientific, societal,
    legal, and economic issues are debated. Surveying and mapping programs need to find ways of
    networking with industry and government to supply needed current and
    detailed applications for the students. In return, the profession needs to
    create positive programs of assistance for schools to provide exposure to
    the newest methods. For example, internships or cooperative education,
    required as a part of a degree program, expose students to many detailed
    hands-on applications that can not be taught in school. Equipment suppliers
    and manufacturers may place equipment in schools through grants or loan.
    Items to teach field operations may be leased or rented for use in school
    during a time period each year. Data sets from industry may be shared with
    schools for reduction and analysis. Specialty instruction need to be provided by
    government-industry-academic exchange programs whereby faculty are placed in
    industry or government in exchange for a practitioner coming to the
    university for a short period." It should be noted that this report was not well received
    by either the surveying and mapping practitioners or by academic teachers in
    the USA. Indeed it was widely criticized. It seems that necessary change is
    seldom welcomed. ConclusionWe have barely begun in our quest to review existing
    surveying and mapping curricula from all areas of the world. There are many
    more regions that are not represented in our data than those that are. It is
    hoped that there will be many more papers presented at the planned
    Commission Two symposium to be held in Rosario City, Argentina in October
    2000 and at the FIG 2001 Working Week in Korea that will expand our
    information pool of existing curricula. While we see much diversity in the
    content of curricula from different countries and even from within each
    country, it is very evident that all areas of the world are finding an
    urgent need to revise that now used to reflect the rapidly changing
    parameters of our profession. References1. Rouch, Jud, 1999. Surveying Education Curricula Design
    In The USA." 1999 FIG Working Week at Sun City, Africa 2. ACSM Report, February 1993, Report of the American
    Congress on Surveying and Mapping National Study on Surveying and Mapping
    Education 3. Rouch, Jud, 1996. " Surveying Education in USA -
    The Need for Innovation" Proceedings of the 63rd
    Permanent Committee Meeting of ACSM in Buenos Aires, Argentina 4. Rouch, Jud, 1989. "Educating the Twenty First
    Century Surveyor" paper presented to the Western Federation of NSPS
    affiliates during their convention at Phoenix, AZ. 5. Lapham, Paul, 1987. "What the Practitioner Needs
    from a New Graduate" Address, XIIth North American Surveying and
    Mapping Teachers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin. 6. Artimo, Kirsi, 1998. "Different Aspects To
    University Education Of Surveyors: Continuos Development And Management Of
    Change, Computer Assistance, Curricula Contents And Participation Of
    Students" 98 FIG Commission 2 Seminar, Wuhan, P.R. China 7. Enemark, Stig, 1998 "Concepts Of Project-Organised
    Education And Lifelong Learning" " 98 FIG Commission 2 Seminar,
    Wuhan, P.R. China 8. Parker, John, 1998 "Managing Change
    Utilising A Quality Approach" " 98 FIG Commission 2 Seminar, Wuhan,
    P.R. China 9. Hodgkinson, Robert, 1998"Quality Assurance
    In Surveying Education" " 98 FIG Commission 2 Seminar, Wuhan, P.R.
    China 10. Changgen, Zhan; Yaolin, Liu; Xinhua, Cao, 1998
    " Cadastral Survey Practice Teaching In WTUSM" " 98 FIG
    Commission 2 Seminar, Wuhan, P.R. China 
 Professor Julian "Jud" Rouch, PLSPast President of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping
 The University of Arkansas at Little Rock
 E-mail: jsrouch@ualr.edu
 18 April 2000
     |