| 
  
    | Article of the Month - 
	  may 2004 |  Direct Geo-Referencing in Practical ApplicationsDr.-Ing. Ralf Schroth, Vice President of FIG This paper was for 
	the first time presented at the ISPRS workshop WG 1/5 about Theory, 
	Technology and Realities of Inertial/GPS Sensor Orientation in 
	Castelldefels/Barcelona, Spain, 23 September 2004. It has been partly 
	revised for the FIG Article of the Month published in May 2004 
       This article in PDF-format. SUMMARY This paper gives an overview to modern technologies in GPS/INS for direct 
	geo referencing from the application point of view. It also describes the 
	integration of these new technologies into mapping market and for other use 
	of surveyors. Empirical results from more than 30 projects are discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION In the field of photogrammetry and remote sensing airborne sensors are 
	more and more applicable. This can be seen directly in relation to the 
	establishment of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in most of the 
	geospatial applications. The users are requiring fast, inexpensive and 
	actual information. The most common airborne sensors nowadays are still the 
	optical systems (passive) like film cameras. But also the different sensors 
	for multispectral applications. Additionally active sensors like the 
	airborne laser systems (LiDAR = Light Detection And Ranging) or InSAR 
	(Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) are more and more important. 
	Especially LiDAR mapping is a fully accepted technology to generate high 
	accurate digital terrain models (DTM). For all these sensors it is necessary 
	to know their 3-dimensional orientation during the time of detection of the 
	information. This is known in photogrammetry as the determination of the 
	exterior orientation parameters and is a standard procedure called aerial 
	triangulation in the photogrammetric workflow.  Since in the seventies additional sensors like the statoscope [1] and 
	later on the application of differential GPS were introduced to measure the 
	elements of the sensor orientation in a direct way. The aim was always to 
	reduce the necessary number of ground control points [2]. Only in the last 
	few years the direct measurement of all parameters of the exterior 
	orientation (so called direct geo-referencing) by a combination of GPS and 
	INertial System (INS) or Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) was successful and 
	could be offered at a reasonable price to the users.  In the following some of the typical sensor systems in practical use 
	should be introduced. The latest results of several projects and sensor 
	types will be presented and the experiences out of the projects from the 
	point of view of a service company will be described.  2 SENSORS AT AN AERIAL SURVEY COMPANY The most common sensor in the field of surveying and mapping is still the 
	traditional aerial film camera. It is assumed that there are about 1,000 
	systems worldwide available whereof about 500 cameras are in daily use (see 
	figure 1). The typical applications are the exposures of black and white, 
	color and color infrared images, which are used for photogrammetric mapping 
	and interpretation. The aim of the integration of IMU’s is to reduce or 
	avoid ground control points and the production step of aerial triangulation. 
     Fig. 1. Photogrammetric film camera RMK TOP (Z/I Imaging) with IMU 
	Aerocontrol (IGI)
 The latest developments are to replace the film cameras by optical 
	digital sensors of similar ground coverage. All of them offer or 
	respectively need the INS for their orientation. A “small format” version 
	can be seen in figure 2; this system has an integrated INS of APPLANIX. Some 
	test flights and the first commercial project showed very reasonable results 
	for special applications (see chapter 4).  
     Fig. 2. Digital camera ALTM 4K02 with control unit (Optech)
 Besides the optical sensors for mapping applications like photogrammetric 
	stereo plotting or digital orthophotos the LiDAR systems are since their 
	strong development during the last 12 years in daily operations. These 
	systems can only be directly geo-referenced and need therefore the GPS/INS 
	system which is an integrated part of it. An example can be seen in figure 
	3. 
     Fig. 3. Airborne laser scanner type ALTM 2050 (Optech)
 Among all the different multispectral systems the thermal scanning (see 
	figure 4) devices are used quite often for the observation and control of 
	temperatures of different features on ground like rivers, leakage of heat 
	pipes etc. As the system needs to be referenced to a ground coordinate 
	system also the GPS/INS to get the orientations of the scan lines in an easy 
	and fast way. 
     Fig. 4. Thermal scanner in Cessna 402
 3 DIRECT GEO-REFERENCING – THE SYSTEM The method of direct geo-referencing allows to transfer sensor or object 
	data immediately into a local or global coordinate system, which makes their 
	further processing possible (see figure 5). Such a system exists of 
	receivers of the global positioning system (GPS) on board and on the ground 
	(reference stations) and an inertial system combined with a sensor, which 
	determines angles and accelerations of the sensor with high precision (see 
	figure 6).  The components of the complete system could be: 
      Inertial system (INS)12 channel L1/L2 GPS receiverControllerFlight management systemGPS reference station 
      
        | 
         Fig. 5. Principle of direct geo-referencing positioning (X,Y,Z) 
		and rotations (phi, omega, kappa) will be captured during the survey 
		flight
 | 
         Fig. 6. GPS/INS system Aerocontrol (IGI Kreuztal) as an example.
 |  4 DIRECT GEO-REFERENCING – THE APPLICATIONS 4.1 Projects  There is now some years experience in photogrammetric companies with the 
	method of direct geo-referencing with GPS/INS systems. LiDAR systems were 
	used since more than 10 years very successfully with integrated GPS/INS 
	systems. The GPS receiver and the INS form together with the laser system a 
	compact unit. By the use of several calibration procedures the results of 
	the LiDAR survey have an accuracy of up to 15 centimeters.  As an example the company Hansa Luftbild is operating since about three 
	years the modular system Aerocontrol for the combination with several 
	sensors. First results were presented in 2001 [3]. In total more than 30 
	projects were finished now (besides the LiDAR projects which will be far 
	more than 100). In table 1 the used sensor types are shown.  The main focus is on the analog film camera with about 68,000 
	images taken in combination with the GPS/INS system. Thereof for about 
	40,000 images the GPS/INS information was used for tests and safety reasons 
	under special terrain conditions. Some of these tests resulted in a 
	long-term study of system calibration (see [4]).  For about 20,000 images the parameters of the exterior orientation were 
	determined and delivered to the clients for their internal use. No 
	information about the quality of these data is available neither their use. 
	Tests were done by the customers themselves. Only about 8,000 images were 
	used in house for further production processing under the control of the 
	quality management system. Table 1. Summary of GPS/INS related projects. 
 All the internal production resulted in the generation of digital 
	orthoimages. The DTM data was delivered by the clients or bought by the 
	regional surveying authorities. The DTM quality and resolution was chosen in 
	respect to the ground resolution of the orthoimages. The quality of the 
	orthoimages was verified by joining images, digital maps and ground control 
	points. In many cases the existing DTM was not sufficient and had to be 
	corrected or filled up with higher resolution DTM data.  So for about 60% of these projects the parameters of the exterior 
	orientation determined out of the IMU data were completely sufficient. For 
	the remaining 40% of the projects additional efforts were necessary. The 
	quality control showed differences which could not be explained by the DTM, 
	standard calibration procedures or similar effects. Therefore these projects 
	were determined by the help of the traditional aerial triangulation. In some 
	cases the overlap of the images was only 30% which is sufficient for direct 
	geo-referencing but not for the aerial triangulation method. The computation 
	of the old procedure called “Anblock” where only the overlapping areas were 
	used for a horizontal triangulation step like in the former model block 
	adjustment brought very reasonable results. This means that some of the 
	defects of the direct geo-referencing were caused by remaining tilts 
	(heading) of the images which could be caused by remaining systematic 
	errors. Of course in a production environment it was impossible to analyze 
	the exact reasons for these defects.  The projects with the thermal scanning device in combination with 
	the Aerocontrol system were quite successful. The GSD was 1,5 m, flying 
	height 750 m above ground. An example of the geo-referenced thermal data can 
	be seen in figure 7. 
     Fig. 7. Thermal image (direct geo- referenced by Aerocontrol)
 The latest experiences this company had with the digital camera system 
    ALTM 4K02 in combination with a LiDAR system. The aim was to produce a 
	digital surface model by LiDAR data and a digital orthoimage out of the 
	camera data. This project showed similar effects as we have seen with the 
	classical film camera. To get reasonable results the system calibration has 
	to be done carefully. The GSD was 0,15 m and the maximum differences at 
	joining images were 0,50 m. The further improvement of the calibration 
	procedure promises even better results. 4.2 Lessons Learnt  The experiences with the direct geo-referencing are quite interesting. It 
	was found out in the beginning that for the determination of the 
	misalignment a separate calibration field in the vicinity of the airport, 
	where the planes are located, is insufficient to take the systematic errors 
	optimal into consideration. The calibration fields are now located inside 
	the area to be flown and must be flown at the same flying height as the 
	whole project. To get the best accuracy this calibration will be done for 
	each flight day and depending on the total length of the daily mission at 
	the beginning and at the end of it. For safety reasons it is recommended to 
	have a forward overlap of the images of 60% to determine if necessary an 
	aerial triangulation.  Besides these points there are some useful regulations during the survey 
	flight itself which have to be taken care of by the flight crew. The 
	long-term stability of the INS has to be taken into account for example when 
	long strips have to be flown.  As the direct geo-referencing method is working without any ground 
	control the datum transformation is also quite sensible. All the information 
	of the sensor is referred to WGS84 system. The final results normally are to 
	be delivered in a local coordinate system, which has certain network 
	deficiencies. As the transformation parameters very often are only available 
	for larger areas with a certain approximation identical points in the 
	vicinity of the area to be flown are necessary.  The integration of the GPS/INS data into the aerial triangulation is also 
	often discussed. Specially to get better approximation values for the 
	automatic procedures. In practical applications we have seen that the GPS 
	data are completely sufficient as start values for the triangulation 
	process. So an additional use of the INS system is a matter of economics. It 
	has to be analyzed if the number of the ground control points can be reduced 
	further more in comparison with the standard use of differential GPS. But 
	also in this case the decision will be taken by economic aspects, i.e. the 
	costs of ground control points vs. the INS. An overall technical discussion 
	of this topic can be seen in [5].  The direct geo-referencing of the sensor data has from the application 
	point of view still a lack of reliability. Many quality control procedures 
	are necessary. The refinement of the mathematical model by many years of 
	research and empirical tests and the high redundancy and reliability of the 
	indirect method like the aerial triangulation ended in a very comfortable 
	environment for the user and above all in a fully acceptance by our 
	customers. To get the same situation with the direct method some more of 
	independent experiments and qualified prediction procedures are absolutely 
	necessary.  5 CONCLUSIONS The use of GPS/INS for direct geo-referencing of airborne scanning 
	devices is nowadays standard. Without this new technology their application 
	would be nearly impossible. Most of the actual developments of digital 
	optical cameras offering integrated IMU’s.  For conventional analog aerial images the procedure of the aerial 
	triangulation is still preferred in the case of stereo plotting. But for the 
	generation of orthoimages the method of direct geo-referencing is coming 
	more and more in practical use. Questions of redundancy respectively 
	reliability, prediction of accuracies and quality control are still open and 
	have to be solved. The procedures for system calibration and determination 
	of the exterior orientation are quite sophisticated and need very skilled 
	engineers.  It is out of question that the application of IMU’s are of great 
	advantage in low-contrast areas like lakes, coastal or dessert zones. The 
	final decision of the use of IMU is besides these technical aspects strongly 
	be influenced by the economical aspects and will be taken project wise.  REFERENCES 
      Ackermann, F.: Accuracy of Statoscope Data – Results from the 
	  OEEPE-Test “Oberschwaben”. Proceedings of ISP Comm. III Symposium, DGK 
	  Series B, No. 214 (1974), 280-286Friess, P.: Kinematische Positionsbestimmung für die Aerotriangulation 
	  mit dem NAVSTAR Global Positioning System. DGK Series C, No. 359 (1990)Schroth, R. (ed.): Hansa Luftbild Symposium on High Precision Sensor 
	  Orientation – On the Way to Direct Geo-Referencing. Münster (2001)Cramer, M. and Stallmann, D.: System Calibration for Direct 
	  Geo-Referencing. Proceedings of ISPRS Comm. III Symposium, Graz (2002)Cramer, M.: Integrated GPS/inertial and digital aerial triangulation – 
	  recent test results. Proceedings of Photogrammetric Week, Stuttgart (2003)
       CONTACTS Dr.-Ing. Ralf Schroth, Vice President of FIGHansa Luftbild Sensorik und Photogrammetrie GmbH
 Elbestr. 5
 48145 Münster
 GERMANY
 Email: schroth@hansaluftbild.de
 Web site: http://www.hansaluftbild.de
 
     |