| Implementation of Marine Cadastre in Israel Haim SREBRO, Israel   
			
				
					| 
					  Haim Srebro
 |  1)  
		This paper was presented at the FIG Working Week in Sofia, Bulgaria, 
		17-21 May 2015. Implementation of marine cadastre in Israel started in 
		2011. This paper elaborates on the implementation and plans 
		regarding a marine cadastre that will achieve a cadastral coverage over 
		the sovereign area of Israel, including a description of its 
		implementation in the approved marine settlement blocks as a result of 
		cooperation between Survey of Israel (SOI) and the Department of Registration and Land 
		Settlement (The Land Registry) under the Ministry of Justice. SUMMARYThe first three marine settlement block plans, designated as marine 
		cadastre in Israel, were approved and signed as registered blocks in 
		October 2011. This was the first milestone of implementing a marine 
		cadastre in Israel following and concluding preparatory work for a few 
		years. Since then, an additional 13 marine blocks have been fully 
		registered and 13 are in an advanced stage before their final approval. 
		This reflects a fast growing interest and various activities regarding 
		the coastal and marine environment in Israel.  Israel is a coastal state. The marine areas of Israel in the 
		Mediterranean Sea include the territorial sea (TS) where it has full 
		sovereignty and the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) where it has partial 
		sovereign rights. In recent years the Survey of Israel (SOI) launched a 
		few relevant initiatives, including the following: coordinate based 
		cadastre (CBC) projects, one of which included transformation of 60 land 
		registration blocks to CBC along the coast line, 3D cadastre, and 
		land-marine Spatial Data Infrastructure. SOI published a series of 
		hydrographic charts and two atlases showing the formal coast lines to 
		support the Law of Protection of the Coastal Environment.  The rapidly developing activities regarding the search for gas and 
		oil in the above-mentioned Israeli marine areas, and the important gas 
		explorations, including the activities of developing a marine 
		infrastructure for the conduction and distribution of the exploited gas, 
		under the responsibility of the Ministry of Energy and Water, play an 
		important role in the development of the marine area. In addition, other 
		ministries advanced development plans in the marine area, including the 
		Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of 
		Transportation, among others.  These requirements were considered before launching the marine 
		cadastre initiative.  The final settlement of a marine cadastre depends on the final 
		delimitation of maritime boundaries between Israel and its neighbors. As 
		long as these boundaries are not concluded and agreed upon, the block 
		plans may cover the marine area except for the marginal blocks that 
		border the international maritime boundaries. In December 2010 Israel 
		and Cyprus agreed on the delimitation of their maritime boundary in the 
		EEZ.  This article elaborates on the above-mentioned situation and plans 
		regarding a marine cadastre that will achieve a cadastral coverage over 
		the sovereign area of Israel, including a description of its 
		implementation in the approved marine settlement blocks as a result of 
		cooperation between SOI and the Department of Registration and Land 
		Settlement (The Land Registry) under the Ministry of Justice. 1. INTRODUCTIONIsrael is a maritime state that connects between the Mediterranean 
		Sea and the Red Sea. In addition, Israel shares the Dead Sea and 
		contains the Kinneret (Sea of Galilee) as an internal lake.  The traditional cadastre, since the beginning of the cadastral 
		surveys by the British authorities in the 1920s, referred only to a land 
		cadastre. This trend continued after the independence of the State of 
		Israel in 1948. Today, the land settlement covers 96% of the land area 
		of Israel. Most of the unsettled land areas are situated in the northern 
		part of the Negev (the South of Israel). The current rate of growth of 
		the population of Israel is very fast, probably the fastest in the 
		western world. This is reflected by fast urbanization, reducing the open 
		and green areas, as well as by utilization of the space above and 
		beneath the ground. This trend is an important reason for the initiative 
		of implementing a spatial cadastre (3D cadastre) in Israel (Shoshany et 
		al., 2004). Following a significant upgrade of technology at the Land 
		Registry, SOI and the Land Registry will hopefully push the 3D cadastre 
		forward. Another phenomenon characterizing the rapid population growth and the 
		fast urbanization is the exploitation of the coastal areas. One of the 
		measures taken to protect the coastal area is the Law of Protection of 
		the Coastal Environment, the reference coast line for which in the 
		Mediterranean Sea was defined by the Director General (DG) of SOI 
		(Srebro, 2008) and afterwards in the Red Sea and the Kinneret in 2011. 
		In addition, there are rapid developments and activities in the sea 
		itself including the enlargement of ports, the construction of new 
		marinas, power stations, cables for communication, the licensing of gas 
		and oil drillings, etc.  In addition, there is a growing trend to construct part of the 
		infrastructure along the coast and in the sea, including a network of 
		gas pipes. This construction, under the responsibility of the Ministry 
		of Energy and Water, is augmented by the exploration of new large gas 
		fields in the sea opposite the Israeli coastline. The Ministry of 
		Agriculture promotes marine agriculture in Israeli waters. Long-range 
		planning takes into account the potential construction of artificial 
		islands, as well as an airport and roads in the Mediterranean Sea 
		opposite the coast.  A few years ago, following an initiative involving the transition to 
		a Coordinate Based Cadastre (Srebro, 2010), which included a pilot 
		project of block plans along the coast line, the DG of SOI decided to 
		begin activities towards establishing a marine cadastre as a 
		continuation of the land cadastre seawards. 2. MARINE CADASTRE2.1 The scope of a marine cadastreThe definition of the term marine cadastre has two interpretations 
		that follow different scopes and concepts (Binns et al., 2003).  One reference to marine cadastre is similar to the land cadastre, 
		referring to boundaries: A marine cadastre is a system that enables the 
		boundaries of maritime rights and interests to be recorded, spatially 
		managed, and physically defined in relationship to the boundaries of 
		other neighboring or underlying rights and interests (Robertson et al., 
		1999). The other definition covers a wider scope: A marine information 
		system, encompassing both the nature and spatial extent of the interests 
		and property rights, with respect to ownership, various rights and 
		responsibilities in the marine jurisdiction (Nichols et al., 2000).  Furthermore, the concept of marine cadastre is developed later on to 
		the scope of the Multipurpose Marine Cadastre in the USA by NOAA Coastal 
		Services Center and the Mineral Management Service (MMS), as shown in 
		their homepage (www.csc.noaa.gov/mmc) 
		and by the FGDC Marine Boundary Working Group. The US Maritime Cadastre is an information system that supplies web 
		services, based on authoritative data sources, integrating legal, 
		physical, ecological, and cultural data and information in a common GIS, 
		as well as rights, restrictions, and responsibilities (Fulmer, 2007).
		 The Canadian approach also refers to the multipurpose nature of the 
		marine cadastre and supports it by a marine geospatial data 
		infrastructure as part of the Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure 
		(Sutherland, 2003). This trend was also adopted by the International Hydrographic 
		Organization, which decided in 2007 to establish a Marine Spatial Data 
		Infrastructure Working Group (MSDIWG) and prepared in 2009 a guidance 
		publication for Hydrographic Offices (IHO Publication C-17 – Edition 
		1.1.0 February 2011) regarding the marine dimension of National Spatial 
		Data Infrastructure (NSDI).  The Israeli approach until now, as practiced in the Sea of Galilee, 
		the Dead Sea, the Red Sea, and the Mediterranean Sea is to adopt the 
		limited scope of a marine cadastre, referring to the boundaries of 
		property rights and the rights of use to be registered. Thus, the marine 
		cadastre in Israel is actually a natural continuation of the land 
		cadastre; it follows the same principles and methods of implementation. In parallel, SOI launched an initiative to build a marine GIS and the 
		DG of the Survey, who chairs the Inter Ministerial Committee for GIS, 
		declared in November 2011 the establishment of a sub-committee for 
		marine SDI. In addition, an agreement on the delimitation of the EEZ was signed 
		between Israel and Cyprus in December 2010. 2.2. The marine areasThe UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (United Nations, 1983) 
		(Hereinafter: The Convention) supplies a general reference regarding the 
		sovereignty and rights of a state in the sea. The Convention defines a 
		few relevant maritime zones with reference to these rights:  Internal waters of a State include waters between the actual 
		coastline and straight baselines along the coasts. A State has full 
		sovereignty in internal waters and its rights over internal waters are 
		identical to its rights over the land area. In cases where internal 
		waters from the baselines landwards are established there is a right of 
		innocent passage (The Convention, Article 8).   The breadth of the territorial sea (TS) of a State covers the area 
		between the baselines along the coasts and a limit line not exceeding 12 
		nautical miles (NM) is measured from the baselines (The Convention, 
		Article 3) (see figures 1 and 2).  
		 Figure 1: The maritime zones of Israel in the Mediterranean Sea (A 
		general approximated scheme. Background: Admiralty Chart 183) 
		 Figure 2: A Profile along the Israeli maritime zones in the 
		Mediterranean Sea A State has full sovereignty over its territorial sea including the 
		air space over the territorial sea and the subsoil (The Convention, 
		Article 2). Vessels of other States have rights to innocent passage in 
		the territorial sea of a State (The Convention, Article 17). The contiguous zone is up to 24 NM (12 NM beyond the TS) from the 
		baselines (The Convention, Article 33). The rights of the State in this 
		area do not refer to sovereignty but instead to the prevention and 
		punishment of infringement of customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary 
		laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea. The exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of a State is up to 200 NM from the 
		coastal baselines (The Convention, Article 57), beyond which are the 
		high seas. The rights of a State in this area refer to living resources 
		like fishing. In addition, there are specific rights for mineral 
		resources and to exploitation of the seabed and sub-surface, which refer 
		to the continental shelf (CS) which may exceed the EEZ under specific 
		conditions in the open sea. There are rights of freedom of navigation as 
		well as flight rights over the EEZ. A State has only limited sovereignty 
		rights over the EEZ to use specific resources (The Convention, Article 
		56). Other zones, which are specified in The Convention beyond 200 NM, for 
		example, with reference to the Legal Continental Shelf and other areas 
		(see also Nichols, 2003), are not relevant to Israel because in the case 
		of the State of Israel the EEZ is less than 200 NM. Thus, the State of 
		Israel has both rights to living resources (referring to the EEZ) and 
		rights to non-living resources (referring to the continental shelf) in 
		its EEZ. Various types of rights are dealt with regarding the maritime zones 
		including navigation rights, customary rights, public access rights, 
		fishing rights, riparian rights, development rights, mineral resources 
		rights and seabed use rights (Sutherland, 2009). The application of The Convention in Israeli waters: Israel is not a 
		party to The Convention, but views the majority of its provisions as 
		customary law. 2.3 The requirements for a marine cadastreThe first question that we have to refer to is: Why do we need a 
		marine cadastre?  The answer is the same as for the land cadastre. It is required in 
		order to settle ownership rights and rights of use. The Israeli cadastre 
		does not stop at the coast line. The more the marine space is utilized, 
		the more the settlement of these rights is and will be required. Since 
		the rights are attached to a specific space, an accurate definition of 
		this space is important. Owing to the lack of geographic features on the 
		surface of the sea, the proper way to define it is to define the 
		geographic spaces by coordinates. The recommended method of delimitation 
		and registration of rights is by implementing a coordinate-based marine 
		cadastre. This is also a preliminary answer to the question, how can a 
		marine cadastre be implemented. The marine cadastre should support the State and the regionally 
		driven marine spatial planning initiatives regarding fishery, 
		transportation, recreation, energy production from wind and wave use, 
		marine agriculture, communication cables, oil and gas permits and 
		drillings, installations and pipelines, protection of marine ecosystems, 
		etc., encompassing both property rights and rights of use. Marine 
		boundaries are not demarcated but delimited by coordinates. Such 
		delimitation should prevent confusion, disagreement and conflicts.   In envisaging future development and requirements, 3D registration is 
		required to enable the management of rights on the sea surface, in the 
		water space, and in the subsoil space. This should also cover 
		archeological sites in the marine space. The second question that we must refer to regarding the application 
		of a marine cadastre is: to which area should the marine cadastre apply? A few government agencies are responsible for answering this 
		question. The ownership of State lands in Israel is under the Israeli 
		Land Authority. The registration of lands is under the responsibility of 
		the Land Registry in the Ministry of Justice and the responsibility for 
		the delimitation of lands for registration, as well as the delimitation 
		of the international borders of Israel, lies with SOI. The Ministry of 
		Foreign Affairs has its relevant responsibility for the international 
		borders of the State. Thus, the final decision regarding the 
		registration in the sea will be a result of cooperation and consultation 
		between a few Government offices. The decision of the DG of SOI 
		regarding this question was to begin technical preparations for a marine 
		cadastre as preliminary work for the final marine cadastre. According to 
		his view, in coordination with the view of the Director of the Land 
		Registry, the first priority should refer to the areas that are under 
		full sovereignty of the State. This should be the area over which a 
		marine cadastre would be applied first. This decision is based on the 
		relevance of the cadastre to ownership and development rights. Ownership 
		rights in a State are covered by its rules which are applicable to its 
		sovereign areas. These areas refer to the land area, the internal waters 
		and the territorial sea of the State. In the future, the question of 
		applying a marine cadastre in the Israeli EEZ should be dealt with, 
		since there are limited sovereign rights in this area. In practice, the 
		current main task in the EEZ is to delimit concession areas and to 
		manage and control permits and rights to drill and exploit minerals.  Following the experience of the USA, Canada and Australia, the 
		Israeli Marine Cadastre should definitely be applied to the Israeli EEZ 
		in the Mediterranean Sea, though it refers to limited rights. This 
		approach requires preparing an Israeli marine spatial data 
		infrastructure that should cover marine areas to the full extent of the 
		Israeli EEZ.  Following this approach it is only a matter of 
		priority to apply the marine cadastre at first only to the Israeli 
		territorial sea area.  However, the legal method of registration of land settlement blocks 
		is followed, since Israeli law in general is currently not applicable to 
		the EEZ, and the current possibility to register marine settlement block 
		plans refers only to the territorial sea area. Taking into account the multilayered marine space on the sea surface, 
		above it, and below it, the answer to the question "where", should 
		include the three-dimensional space down to the depth of the subsoil.
		 The third question is: When should a marine cadastre be implemented?
		 The answer is: as soon as possible. This is justified by the low cost 
		and the high speed of the "land" settlement process when an area is 
		owned by the State and is still mostly free of rights of use, and is 
		characterized by low density of man-made features. The planned 
		activities and the continuous process of development and exploitation of 
		land along the coast, which is also reflected in the fast growing value 
		of lands along the coast, indicate that in the future the creation of a 
		marine cadastre will be much more costly and will take much more time 
		due to the construction of various installations and utilities. This answer has already been validated for the last four years by the 
		accelerated activities of the Ministries and Municipalities in the 
		marine area.   2.4 Practical analysis of the implementation of marine cadastre in 
		IsraelAs already indicated, Israeli waters include four areas: the 
		Mediterranean Sea, the Red Sea, the Dead Sea, and the Sea of Galilee. The Sea of Galilee is a lake within Israel. It already went through a 
		regular land settlement process, and was divided into 4 blocks as seen 
		in figure 3. This lake is considered as a land area and is not covered by The 
		Convention. Furthermore, due to the temporary lowering of the water 
		level of the lake, its outer strip has already partially dried, and each 
		of the four blocks consists today of both a water and land area.  The northern part of the Dead Sea is divided by an international 
		boundary following the October 26, 1994 Treaty of Peace between Israel 
		and Jordan (Israel-Jordan Peace Treaty, 1994). The historical southern 
		part of the Dead Sea, has contracted and dried and is practically a 
		basin used for salt pans on each side of the international boundary 
		between Israel and Jordan (see figure 4). 
			
				|  
				Figure 4: The settlement blocks in the Dead Sea and Salt Pans
 |  
 Figure 3: The land settlement blocks in the 
				Kinneret |  
				|  
				Figure 5: The land settlement blocks in the Red Sea |  Figures 3 and 5* make use of data from the National Bathymetry 
		Project. (* Sade A.R., Hall J.K., Tibor G. et al (GIS Report GIS/03/2008) IOLR 
		Report IOLR/08/2008) The Israeli Salt Pans' area is considered and dealt with to-day as a 
		land area. The Israeli waters of the Dead Sea are actually internal 
		waters. The land settlement in this area is dealt with like a land 
		settlement over the land area. The limits of the block plans in this 
		area, which are currently undergoing a land settlement process up to the 
		international boundary, are defined by coordinates, so it can be 
		considered as a practical (and not yet a legal) coordinate- based 
		cadastre.  The Israeli waters in the Gulf of Eilat - which is a branch of the 
		Red Sea also called the Gulf of Aqaba - are considered a territorial 
		sea. They lie between the coastline and the maritime boundary between 
		Israel and Jordan, which was concluded in 1996 following the 1994 Treaty 
		of Peace (Israeli-Jordanian Maritime Boundary Agreement, 1996). The 
		southern limit of this area has not yet been defined because Israel and 
		Egypt have not yet agreed on a maritime boundary in this gulf, but 
		following Article 15 of The Convention it should be delimited along the 
		equidistance line going from the terminus of the land boundary at Taba 
		(Srebro, 2009) up to the median line along the Gulf of Eilat. Since all 
		the Israeli waters in the Red Sea are considered territorial sea under 
		Israeli sovereignty, a marine cadastre in this area is applicable. 
		Actually, most of the area has already been settled as an extension of 
		the land cadastre (see figure 5). 2.5 Parallel relevant activities at the Survey of IsraelThe basic definition of a marine cadastre includes the delimitation 
		of the cadastral blocks. Since the delimitation refers mainly to 
		coordinates on the water surface, the number of physical features that 
		are included in the block plans will be very limited, if any. But, since 
		the relevance of the cadastral delimitation, beyond the cases of special 
		installations and potential artificial islands, is to the multilayered 
		marine space, including the seabed and the subsoil, a proper mapping of 
		the seabed, including physical features in the relevant area, is an 
		important contribution to the cadastral division and to its application. 
		 At present, most of the blocks will have no such information. The 
		blocks that will include some features will be the first line of blocks 
		that are near the coast and a few blocks where gas or oil drilling sites 
		plus transportation pipes or infrastructure cables that may exist as 
		well as fish growing sea farms. Two other relevant activities are carried out during the last years 
		by SOI. One is the production of a series of hydrographic charts. SOI 
		has prepared 10 hydrographic charts covering the Israeli Territorial Sea 
		in the Mediterranean Sea. This includes one 1:250,000 chart, three 
		1:100,000 charts and seven large scale charts, in the framework of 
		cooperation with the Ministry of Transportation for the purpose of 
		safety of navigation. These charts contain a lot of data in the marine 
		area that can support a marine cadastre. The source data are collected 
		by the Survey of Israel, the Geological Survey of Israel, and the Israel 
		Oceanographic & Limnological Institute. An additional hydrographic chart 
		is being prepared for the Gulf of Eilat. Another activity refers to the National Bathymetric Project, which is 
		run by a few agencies including the Geological Survey of Israel, the 
		Israel Oceanographic & Limnological Institute, the Survey of Israel and 
		others.  As analyzed by Ng'ang'a et al. (2003), bathymetry may play a 
		significant role in marine cadastre. This refers to the wide scope of 
		marine cadastre, including the safety of navigation, laying 
		communication cables, exploring and drilling for offshore oil and gas, 
		the location of underwater mineral deposits, and gaining an 
		understanding of the geological processes. It has a potential that has 
		not yet been implemented, which can be used in combination with other 
		geographic information to support marine boundary delimitation and 
		property rights. Bathymetry mapping is presented in this article in 
		figures 3 to 5.   In addition, when the use of mineral resources on the seabed and in 
		the subsoil develops, or when construction of special marine projects, 
		like artificial islands, develops, the need for implementing 3D or a 
		multi-dimensional cadastre will increase.   This requires the implementation of a CBC in the marine areas. 
		Therefore, taking into account the present supporting technologies and 
		infrastructure at SOI, the definition of the Israeli marine cadastre 
		should be based on coordinates. This meets one of the present main initiatives at SOI, namely, to 
		transfer to a CBC. In addition, SOI has been promoting for a few years 
		an initiative of a 3D cadastre (Shoshany et al, 2004). This should be 
		integrated, when applied, into the marine cadastre wherever required.
		 The implementation of a CBC requires that all the boundaries of a 
		block be defined by coordinates (Srebro, 2010). A full definition of 
		blocks by coordinates in the sea is quite simple except for the case 
		near the limits of the marine areas of a state. This limitation refers 
		to the boundary between the marine area and the coastal area, in case 
		that such a boundary is not defined by dominating coordinates but 
		rather, by legal graphical documents. It also refers to the delimitation 
		of the territorial sea of a State and an adjacent State (usually an 
		equidistance line) and to the case of delimitation of the territorial 
		sea between a State and an opposite State (usually a median line). 3. THE MARINE AREAS OF ISRAEL IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEAThe cases of the Israeli marine areas in the Kinneret, the Dead Sea, 
		and the Red Sea have been described earlier and it was concluded that 
		the limits of the block plans in these areas should be transformed from 
		legal graphical documents to legal coordinates. However, the case of the marine area along the coastline of the 
		Mediterranean Sea is more complicated. The length of the coastline is 
		around 200km, along which exist 291 land settled block plans (see figure 
		6). The borders of 60 of these blocks have already been defined by 
		coordinates (Klebanov and Forrai, 2010).   
		 Figure 6 (a, b, c): Land blocks along the coast (In red: Coordinate 
		based Cadastre (CBC) blocks) The Israeli TS in this area extends to a distance of 12 NM from the 
		base lines along the coastline. The EEZ of Israel in the Mediterranean 
		Sea cannot cover 200NM from the coast, because the distances between the 
		coasts of Israel and Cyprus, which are opposite coasts, are between 
		120NM and 200NM. Under customary international maritime law, the median 
		line between Israel and Cyprus, which is the outer limit of the Israeli 
		EEZ, is half way between the coastlines. As seen in figure 2, the 
		Israeli CS is included in the EEZ. In order to define a marine cadastre, 
		the TS should be sub-divided into block plans. The area close to the 
		coastline should be dealt with differently than the area that is more 
		distant, because most of the physical features and development in the 
		marine area are close to the coast. This refers to constructions like 
		ports, marinas, breakwaters, and pipelines. This area is also protected 
		by the law that protects coastal environments (Srebro, 2008). As a result, it was decided to limit the size of the adjacent blocks, 
		whereas the more distant ones were designed roughly to a size of 5x5km 
		(see figure 7a) following the preliminary guidelines of the land 
		settlement officer. An optional plan takes into account the limits of 
		existing permits of exploration areas (see figure 7b). 
		 Figure 7: The suggested marine cadastre blocks in the Mediterranean 
		Sea With reference to the delimitation of the blocks by coordinates, 
		there is a basic requirement to define the land block plans along the 
		coast by official coordinates. In order to achieve this, a pilot project 
		of CBC was launched in 2006. This project included four areas of 15 
		block plans each, spread along the coast in four typical environments: 
		one in a dense urban location, one in a semi-urban location, one in an 
		agricultural location and one in an open area. The results, which were 
		published in 2008, were 60 coordinate-based blocks, the coordinates of 
		50 of which were distributed to surveyors for optional use. The legal 
		cadastre in Israel still does not adopt coordinates for registration 
		(Klebanov and Forrai, 2010). This enables defining coordinate-based marine cadastre blocks 
		neighboring the land coordinate-based block plans, but these are only 
		part of the 291 blocks along the coast line. In order to overcome this 
		problem, the DG of SOI decided to adopt a reference line connecting base 
		points on the coast by straight lines, to serve as a reference line for 
		the marine cadastre. The base points were surveyed by GPS and defined by 
		coordinates to serve as a digital border line between the blocks 
		adjacent to the coast and the "pure" marine blocks.  In addition, since the maritime boundaries between Israel and Lebanon 
		in the north and between Israel and Gaza Strip in the south are not yet 
		mutually agreed upon, the marine cadastre is planned in these areas 
		until and including the penultimate blocks, leaving the border blocks to 
		be settled following future political settlement of the delimitation of 
		the neighboring territorial sea areas. In addition, the DG of SOI 
		decided to prepare for settlement the marine blocks east of the 
		reference line landwards, which are opposite the land coordinate-based 
		blocks, the coordinates of which were determined in the CBC pilot 
		project. An example of such blocks is given in figure 8.  The area between the coastline and the straight reference lines holds 
		22 settled blocks which had already been settled due to existing land 
		development along the coast. The marine cadastre blocks, which refer to 
		this limited area, contain 63 blocks that are in a planning process, and 
		will be presented graphically in a 1:20,000 scale or larger for 
		registration.  The estimated number of blocks that are included in the planned 
		marine cadastre between the above-mentioned straight reference lines and 
		the outer limit of the Israeli TS is 175 blocks. Most of these blocks, 
		except the outer limits, cover as previously indicated 5x5 km (see 
		figure 7a). The blocks can be graphically represented in a scale of 
		1:20,000.  
		 Figure 8: Example of CBC land block plans along the coast On the 17th of December 2010 Israel and Cyprus signed an agreement 
		regarding the maritime delimitation line of the EEZ between the two 
		States.  The agreement was ratified in February 2011 and deposited with the 
		UN. This was an important step regarding the delimitation of Israeli 
		rights in the Mediterranean Sea. 
		 Figure 9: The EEZ delimitation line between Israel and Cyprus (On 
		Admiralty Chart 183) This agreement fully coincides with the EEZ delimitation agreements 
		between Cyprus and Egypt (2003) and between Cyprus and Lebanon (2007). 
		The agreement left a level of flexibility for defining final common 
		tri-points between the relevant states at the edges of the delimited 
		line.  Following this agreement, one can see that the marine area in which 
		Israel has exclusive economic rights is in the magnitude of the Israeli 
		land area.  4. THE METHODOLOGY AND THE PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATIONAs mentioned earlier, the DG of SOI and the Director of the Land 
		Registry, agreed to promote a land settlement in the marine area. They 
		agreed to begin with a pilot project of a marine cadastre in the TS of 
		Israel, where Israeli law is fully applicable, and at a second stage, 
		explore the legal feasibility of initiating settlement proceedings in 
		the EEZ. In the EEZ Israel has limited rights according to customary 
		international law, among them the rights to exploit natural resources, 
		including gas and oil. The project included three marine cadastre 
		blocks.  The methodology The recommended methodology of implementing a marine cadastre in 
		Israel follows the basic methodology used in the Israeli land settlement 
		process: 
			General planning of the area to be settled;Public declaration by a land settlement officer regarding land 
		settlement in specified areas, announcing that potential claimers may 
		submit claims for ownership and for rights of use in these areas.Submitting claims;Publishing a table of claims;Checking and validating claims and their limits, including field 
			checks in the presence of the claimers; Concluding a table of rights by the land settlement officer and 
			publishing it;Legal appeals to a District Court (optional).   The technical and practical solution used by SOI for the 
		implementation was a result of the special circumstances associated with 
		the marine cadastre, where demarcation is not relevant and the 
		delimitation of boundaries is actually the process of defining 
		coordinates.  In order to minimize the problems of the external limit of the 
		relevant marine area seawards to be settled at this stage, this line was 
		defined as a line 12 nm from the base line along the coast, actually the 
		outer limit of the territorial sea. In order to have a proper limit 
		defined by coordinates, the chosen pilot area was one of the places on 
		land that underwent a process of transformation to coordinates in the 
		CBC pilot project (Srebro, 2010). These decisions limited the problems 
		because the marine blocks should be defined between polygons that are 
		well defined by coordinates. The area that was chosen for a pilot 
		project is an area south of the city of Haifa. The relevant coastal land 
		blocks along this area that were transformed to CBC in 2006 are shown in 
		Figure 8. The traditional legal cadastral registration is still based on 
		graphical documentation. One should consider that the landwards limit of 
		the blocks along the coast line, which is the cadastral reference in 
		this area, does not coincide with the coast line existing in the 
		National GIS, as depicted from aerial photographs. However, it does not 
		coincide with the coast line defined by the DG to support the law for 
		the protection of the coastal environment (Srebro, 2008), which is 
		defined at a level of 0.75 m from the zero of leveling. It also does not 
		coincide with the exact low water line, which changes with time, or with 
		the straight base line in this area. In addition, the existing 
		administrative municipal line in the area does not coincide with the 
		cadastral reference (see figure 10). The cadastral external line along the coast is a polygon connecting 
		the external (western) limits of the coastal land blocks. The result of 
		the decision to use the straight base lines along the coast as 
		boundaries of marine blocks created the first series of marine blocks 
		covering the internal waters between the outer limit of the land blocks 
		and the line connecting the coastal base points (the Reference Line in 
		figure 10).  The preference for the lateral limits of the first marine blocks was 
		to refer to existing municipal boundaries, but the municipal limits are 
		currently undergoing re-definition.  The size of the regular marine blocks between the reference line 
		connecting the coastal base points and the outer limits of the 
		territorial sea was defined roughly by 5x5 km cells following the 
		preference of the land settlement officer (Figure 11).  
		 Figure 10: A - Various existing reference lines along the coast
 B - An enlargement showing the various reference lines
 C - Coast line for the Law of Protection of Coastal Environment
 The first legal step of the land settlement officer of the District 
		of Haifa was to declare publicly his intention to settle the specific 
		area in the near future. This declaration is under article 9 of the Land 
		Title Settlement Law. This declaration, which is published in Reshumot 
		(the official gazette of the Government), in newspapers and on the 
		internet, provides notices to people or organizations that have claims 
		regarding the area specified in the declaration; they can submit their 
		claims within the period specified in the public announcement (two 
		months). This declaration was published on July 12, 2011. During the specified period, the land settlement officer has to 
		announce a formal visit to the area, to serve as an opportunity to show 
		all potential claimers the area of settlement and to give a chance to 
		any claimer to show the physical limits of his claim.  This procedure, which is a standard procedure in land settlement, was 
		also used for the settlement of the marine blocks. But since visual 
		physical features in the sea are rare, unlike the situation on land, an 
		alternative was found by organizing a sailing expedition to inspect the 
		marine blocks that were nominated in the published declaration.  
		 Figure 11: The scheme of the final cadastral blocks at the area of 
		the pilot project Under another regulation, the formal visit to the area should be 
		publicly announced (in the printed and electronic media) 14 days in 
		advance. This was done and the sailing expedition to the area took place 
		on September 8, 2011.   As an expression of the "historical" moment in implementing a marine 
		cadastre in Israel, both the DG of SOI and the Director of Land Registry 
		and part of the relevant staff were on board the ship.  There were no private claimers who joined the expedition, but the 
		leading claimer attended it. He was a senior representative of the 
		Israeli National Land Authority, which is responsible for the management 
		of all State owned lands. This reflected the fact that the Government of 
		the State of Israel claims ownership over the area under Art.108 of the 
		1969 Land Law.  The trip took half a day following mainly the limits of the blocks, 
		but no physical evidences were found except a few buoys. The sea bed was 
		also explored by sonar and no unusual findings were registered there 
		either. Following this formal visit to the area, the land settlement officer 
		made decisions regarding the limits of ownership and right of use in the 
		relevant blocks (specific strip parcels were assigned for a 
		communication cable in the area). SOI prepared final block plans 
		following the instructions of the land settlement officer. These block 
		plans were signed officially, as required by law, by the DG of SOI. Then 
		the land settlement officer published his decisions about the assignment 
		of ownership and rights of use within these blocks and the blocks were 
		registered at the beginning of October 2011. Following the successful 
		pilot project, SOI and the Land Registry continue their cooperation 
		regarding the settlement of marine blocks. At the end of summer 2014: 16 
		marine blocks were fully registered and an additional 13 marine blocks 
		are close to their final approval before registration. An additional 106 
		marine blocks are included in a bi-annual plan to begin the land 
		settlement process, not including the marginal blocks along the limits 
		of the territorial sea zone.  
		 Figure 12: Status of southern marine cadastre blocks (white blocks - 
		finally registered blocks; green blocks – before final approval)  Following this process but with no direct connection, the DG of the 
		Ministry of Interior – the Ministry responsible for defining municipal 
		boundaries in Israel - nominated a committee to define the boundaries in 
		the sea of the municipal authorities along the coast line. This step 
		reflects the growing importance of the marine areas along the coast line 
		in general and especially for the cities and towns spread along the 
		coast line. It can propel and accelerate the process of land settlement 
		in the sea along the coast expanding the marine cadastre. Defining the 
		new municipal boundaries will influence the internal boundaries within 
		the first line of marine blocks. When the author appeared in front of 
		the committee, he recommended that municipal limits be defined in full 
		coordination with the limits of the cadastral block plans. This will also require a change in the front series of land blocks in 
		order to adjust the limits of the blocks to the new external municipal 
		line either by enlarging existing blocks or by adding new blocks. 
		 Figure 13: Plan for 2014-2015  In addition to this activity, a special committee is expected to be 
		formed to consolidate inter- ministerial activities, initiating a policy 
		document regarding the marine areas of Israel. The intention of the 
		author of this article is that this committee will also promote 
		collection and integration of data and knowledge, to become the basis of 
		a marine geospatial data base in which the marine cadastre will be one 
		of the layers, and thus create a Marine Geospatial Data Infrastructure 
		as part of the Israeli Spatial Data Infrastructure (ISDI). The marine 
		geospatial data base will be connected to the land geospatial 
		infrastructure to form a land-marine geospatial data base.       
		 As part of this effort, SOI is in the process of converting the 
		hydrographic data included in its series of hydrographic charts to GIS. 
		One of the major challenges in this process is the different data 
		standards that are used for land and marine geo-information. 5. CONCLUSIONSThe author has adopted the definition of a marine cadastre regarding 
		the definition of cadastral borders and not the wide scope of marine 
		information (a multipurpose marine cadastre).  There is a definite requirement for both, but the issue regarding the 
		development of a marine spatial data infrastructure should and will be 
		dealt with separately. The rapid land development and exploitation of 
		lands along the coasts contribute to the trend of development of the 
		marine areas. The Israeli sovereign rights in the marine area should be 
		geo-referenced and referred to a cadastral infrastructure, as early as 
		possible, in order to obtain more benefits at lower cost as long as 
		there are no conflicting claims.  The strong requirement to utilize the marine areas of Israel and the 
		need to prepare the infrastructure for management of rights in this area 
		resulted in an initiative to implement an Israeli Marine Cadastre 
		regarding the definition of cadastral borders (Srebro et al., 2010) and 
		to prepare a plan for such an implementation.  Following this initiative and the following implementation plan, 
		there was a significant advancement. The Survey of Israel and the Land 
		Registry have already finished in October 2011 the process of settling 
		16 marine cadastral blocks and an additional 13 blocks await final 
		approval. The process of implementation was smooth, fast, and at a low 
		cost. In parallel a few other activities connected to the marine 
		environment developed: Israel signed a maritime delimitation agreement in the EEZ with 
		Cyprus; new large gas fields were discovered, requiring the construction 
		of a conduction and distribution network including coastal terminals; an 
		effort to delimit the municipal boundaries in the sea was launched, 
		coastal environment protection regulations and measures have been 
		implemented; and activities involving integrating governmental data into 
		the marine area as well as building a Marine Spatial Data Infrastructure 
		have been considered and practical measures have been taken. These 
		activities show the importance of fast implementation of a marine 
		cadastre as long as the cost remains low. The marine cadastre will 
		contribute to improve planning and coordination and can optimize 
		investments.  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe author thanks Advocate Alisa Caine the Director of the Israeli 
		Land Registry at the Ministry of Justice and Mr. Haim Laredo the Land 
		Settlement Officer of the District of Haifa. The author thanks the 
		people of the Survey of Israel (SOI) for their help with the data and 
		most of the figures:  Mr. Ronen Regev, the Director General; Mr. Itzhak 
		Fabrikant, Deputy Director for Cadastre; Mrs. Orit Marom head of the 
		cadastral department; Dr. Yaron Felus, Chief Scientist; and Mrs. Eti 
		Benin, Mr. Baruch Peretzman, Mr. Elias Koifman, Mr. Hagi Ronen, Mrs. 
		Limor Gur-Arie, Mrs. Lea Ezra and Mrs. Rachel Saranga. The author thanks 
		Mr. Ronie Sade for his support with the figures based on the data of the 
		National Bathymetry Project and Spot data. Note: The basic version of this article was written in 2012 when the 
		author still served as the DG of SOI. REFERENCESAgreement on the Delimitation of the Exclusive Economic Zone between 
		Israel and Cyprus (2010), signed in Nicosia on 17 December 2010. 
		 Binns A., Rajabifard A., Collier P.A. and Williamson I., (2003), 
		Issues in Defining the Concept of a Marine Cadastre for Australia, 
		UNB-FIG Meeting on Marine Cadastre Issues, New Brunswick, Canada, 15-16 
		September 2003. Binns A., (2005), Defining a Marine Cadastre – Legal & Institutional 
		Aspects, Marine Administration Workshop Understanding the Spatial 
		Dimension, Sydney, Australia, 1 December 2005.   Fulmer J., (2007), The Multipurpose Cadastre Web Map. Presented at 
		2007 ESRI Survey & Engineering GIS Summit, San Diego, California, June 
		16-19, 2007. Byrne T., J.E. Hughes-Clarke, S.E. Nichols and M.I. Buzeta, (2002), 
		The Delineation of the Seaward Limits of a Coastal Marine Protected Area 
		Using Non-Terrestrial Subsurface Boundaries – The Musquash Estuary MPA. 
		Published in the Proceedings of the Hydrographic Conference, Toronto, 
		Canada, May 2002. International Hydrographic Organization, (2011), Spatial Data 
		Infrastructures "The Marine Dimension", Guidance for Hydrographic 
		Offices, C-17 Edition 1.1.0., February 2011,IHB, Monaco. Israel-Jordan Peace Treaty (1994), Peace Treaty between the State of 
		Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, 26 October 1994, UNTS 35325 
		Volume 2402. Israel-Jordan Maritime Boundary (1996), The Maritime Boundary between 
		the State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, 18 January 
		1996, UNTS 35333 Volume 2403.    Klebanov M. and Forrai J., (2010), Implementation of Coordinate Based 
		Cadastre in Israel: Experience and Perspectives. Proceedings of XXIV FIG 
		Congress, Sydney, Australia. Ng'ang'a S., Nichols S. and Monahan D., (2003), The Role of 
		Bathymetry Data in a Marine Cadastre: Lessons from Proposed Marine 
		Protected Area. US Hydrographic Conference, Biloxi, Mississippi, 24-27 
		March 2003. Ng'ang'a S., Nichols S., Sutherland M. and Cockburn S., (2001), 
		Toward a Multidimensional Marine Cadastre in support of good Ocean 
		Governance, New Spatial Information Management Tools and Heir Role in 
		Natural Resource Management, International Conference on Spatial 
		Information for Sustainable Development, Nairobi Kenia, 2-5 October 
		2001.  Nichols S., Monahan D. and Sutherland M., (2000), Good Governance of 
		Canada's Offshore and Cadastral zone: Towards an Understanding of the 
		Marine Boundary Issues. Geomatica, 54 (4) 415-424. Nichols S., Ng'ang'a S., Cockburn S. and Sutherland M., (2003), 
		Marine Cadastre: The basis for understanding the use and governance of 
		marine spaces. Presented on behalf of the Association of Canada Land 
		Surveyors to the Parliamentary Committee on Oceans, Canada, 17 February 
		2003. Robertson B., Benwell G. and Hoogsteden C., (1999), The Marine 
		Resource: Administration Infrastructure Requirements, UN-FIG Conference 
		on Land Tenure and Cadastral Infrastructure for Sustainable Development, 
		Melbourne, Australia.  Shoshani U., Benhamo M., Goshen E., Denekamp S. and Bar R., (2004), 
		Registration of Cadastral Spatial Rights in Israel – A Research and 
		Development Project, FIG Working Week Athens Greece, May 2004. Srebro H., (2008), Definition of the Israeli Coastline, FIG Working 
		Week 2008, Stockholm, Sweden, 14-19 June 2008. Srebro H., (2009), The Definition of the Israeli International 
		Boundaries in the Vicinity of Eilat, FIG Working Week 2008, Eilat, 
		Israel, 3-8 May 2009. Srebro H., (2010), On The Way to a Coordinate Based Cadastre (CBC) in 
		Israel, FIG International Congress, Sydney, Australia, 11-16 April 2010. Srebro H., Fabrikant I. and Marom O., (2010), Towards a Marine 
		Cadastre in Israel, FIG International Congress, Sydney, Australia, 11-16 
		April 2010. Stein D. and Taylor C., (2009), Working Towards a Multipurpose Marine 
		Cadastre, Workshop on Best Practices for Marine Spatial Planning, The 
		Nature Conservancy, Arlington VA, 2009 Sutherland M., (2003), Report on the outcomes of The UNB-FIG Meeting 
		on Marine Cadastre Issues Held at The Wu Centre, University of New 
		Brunswick Fredricton, New Brunswick, Canada 15-16 September 2003. Sutherland M., (2009), Developing a Prototype Marine Cadastre. 7th 
		FIG Regional Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam, 19-22 October 2009. United Nations, (1983), The Law of the Sea, Official Text of the 
		United Nations Convention on The Law of the Sea with Annexes and Index. United Nations Publication, Sales No. E.83.V.5, New York, 1983. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTESDr. Haim SREBRO received his BSc and MSc degrees from the Technion, 
		Haifa, in Civil Engineering and Geodetic Engineering and his PhD from 
		Bar-Ilan University. He was a teacher at the Technion and at Tel-Aviv 
		University. He served during the years 2003-2012 as the Director General 
		of the Survey of Israel and as Chair of the Inter Ministerial Committee 
		for GIS. He is a Co-Chairman of the Israeli-Jordanian Joint Team of 
		Experts since 1994, responsible for the delimitation, demarcation, 
		documentation and maintenance of the International Boundary within the 
		Joint Boundary Commission. Since 1974 he is a leading figure in the 
		boundary negotiations and demarcations between Israel and its neighbors 
		and signed the 1994 Peace Treaty between Israel and Jordan and the 1996 
		Maritime Boundary Delimitation. In 2010 he signed the Israel-Cyprus 
		Agreement on the EEZ Delimitation.  He was a member of ASPRS since 1978 and a member of ACSM and is a 
		member of the Israeli Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, the 
		Israeli association of Cartography and GIS, and of the Israeli Chambre 
		of Licensed Surveyors.  Dr. Srebro was the Conference Director of FIG Working Week 2009 at 
		Eilat.  He chairs the WG on International Boundaries of FIG Commissions 1. He was the editor-in-chief of The New Atlas of Israel in Hebrew 
		(2008) and English (2011), and of the Atlases of the Israeli coast lines 
		in the Mediterranean Sea (2005) and in the Red Sea and in the Kinneret 
		(2011). He is co-author of the book 60 Years of Surveying and Mapping 
		Israel (2009), author of the book The Boundaries of Israel Today (2012), 
		Editor and co-author of FIG Publication No 59 on International Boundary 
		Making (2013), and author of a few books in Hebrew.   CONTACTSDr. Haim SREBRO         
		12 Teena St., Maccabim-Reut 7179902, Israel
 Tel. +972-(0)50-6221400;  Fax + 972-8-9263471
 Haim.srebro[at]gmail.com
 |